Home Maxims & Terms Disclosing of mind by Court meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Disclosing of mind by Court

Disclosing of mind by Court legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 PCrLJ 407 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
S. 497Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302Qatl-e-amdBail, grant ofTransfer of caseDisclosing of mind by CourtTrial Court, while dismissing post-arrest bail gave specific observationsEffectBy giving specific observations in the order had exposed mind of Trial Court by diving deep into the merits of the case

Trial Court failed to keep in mind that at bail stage only cursory perusal of prosecution evidence and material collected by investigating agency was to be taken into consideration

Order passed by Trial Court was result of excess of jurisdiction and the same was set aside

As Trial Court had already exposed his mind, High Court did not find it safe to allow him to continue with trial

High Court withdrew the case from Trial Court and entrusted to other Court and directed the transferee Court to decide bail application afresh

Case was remanded in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Disclosing of mind by Court", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944858

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Disclosing of mind by Court"

PCRLJ 2014
2013-November-25

2014 P Cr

AHMAD YAR — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Islamabad
PCRLJ 2019
2017-August-9

2019 P Cr

MEHRAN HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, HYDERABAD and 5 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh (Hyderabad Bench)
PLD 1981
Criminal Appeal No. 16 of 1979, decided on 28th June, 1981.

P L D 1981 Quetta 18

GHULAM MUHAMMAD SHEERAZI‑‑Appellant, Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: S. 6(5)‑Sanction for prosecution, validity of‑Although no particu lar form in which order of sanction to be recorded specified in law yet order should be capable of revealing allegations with some degree of accuracy‑Omission of particular section of law or date of offence or such like details‑Condonable‑Order of sanction accorded in respect of an amount allegedly misappropriated by accused and such amount recovered by him by way of land revenue while evidence clearly indicating that accused was unconcerned with same‑On con trary evidence led at trial disclosing misappropriation of amount recovered as proceeds of land in Mianji‑khana, a separate and distinct head of account‑Sanctioning Authority, however, keeping in mind misappropriation of amount on account of land revenue recoveries as disclosed by challan and proceeding to pass order most mechanically Order, held, invalid, in circumstances.‑Sanction for prosecution.
PTD 2000
Special Civil. Applications Nos. 3257, 3258, and 3259 of 1991, decided on 24th November, 1998.

2000 P T D 3076

GARDEN SILK MILLS (PVT.) LTD. Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: 237 I T R 668
PTD 2004
C. P. No. D‑1574 of 1994, decided on 3rd April, 2004.

2004 P T D 1901

Messrs MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX and others

Court: Karachi High Court
PCRLJ 1994
1993-February-17

1994 P Cr

GULZAR AHMAD and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1988
Petition of Special Leave to Appeal No.48 of 1987, decided on 21st December, 1987.

1988 P Cr

Haji ALI MUHAMMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus ABDUL RASHID and 8 others‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1986
Civil Revision No. 538 of 1985, decided on 22nd September, 1985.

1986 C L C 2212

Haji NOOR MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SHAFI — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PTD 2004
N/A

2004 P T D 633

MUHAMMAD SALEEM Versus INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL and 2 others

Court: Lahore High Court
PTD 2017
I.T.R No.13 of 2017, decided on 1st February, 2017.

2017 P T D 1153

Messrs GHEE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE and others

Court: Lahore High Court