Home Maxims & Terms Political party meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Political party

Political party legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2025 PLD 67 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss. 215(5), 209 & 210Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 17(2)Political partyFailure to conduct intra-party electionsNon-allocation of election symbolNo further penalty beyond the specified non-allocation of an election symbol

It is unequivocal that Section 215(5) of the Elections Act, 2017 prescribes a penal consequence for a political party's failure to comply with the provisions of Section 209 (regarding intra-party elections) or Section 210 (regarding the sources of the party's funds)

The specified penalty of non-allocation of an election symbol curtails the political party's fundamental right to function and operate as a political party-a right implicit in the right to form a political party guaranteed by Article 17(2) of the Constitution

Therefore, Section 215(5) must be construed strictly

No further penalty or consequence beyond the specified non-allocation of an election symbol can be inferred or assumed from Section 215(5)

Additionally, no other constitutional or statutory right of the political party can be denied on the basis of the non-allocation of an election symbol under this provision.

2024 PLD 295 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss. 208 & 215(5)Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 218(1) & 185(3)Political partyIntra party electionsFailure to hold intra party elections in accordance with the party's own Constitution

Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) declaring the political party ineligible to obtain the elections symbol it had applied for

Petition for leave to appeal filed by the ECP before the Supreme Court against a judgment of the High Court - Maintainability

If the ECP could be sued before the High Court, it would be a denial of justice and manifestly unfair if it could not then assail the decision of the High Court (before the Supreme Court)

Therefore, the objection to the maintainability of present petition was without legal substance and was overruled.

2024 PLD 295 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss. 208, 209 & 215(5)Political partyIntra party electionsPolitical party failing to hold intra party elections in accordance with its own ConstitutionEffect

Party declared ineligible to obtain the elections symbol it had applied for.

2024 PLD 267 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss. 208 & 215(5)Political partyIntra party electionsFailure to hold intra party elections in accordance with the party's own ConstitutionEffect

Political party declared ineligible to obtain the elections symbol it had applied for.

2014 PLD 330 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Art. 17(2)Political partyRight to form governmentScope

Where a political party contested the election successfully, it had a fundamental right to form government provided it enjoyed the requisite majority.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Political party", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124945172

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Political party"

CLC 1986
Application, decided on 28th June, 1986.

1986 C L C 2189

Court: ‑‑‑S. 12 as added by Political Parties (Amendment) Act (XXII of 1985) ‑‑Political party‑‑Procedure for registration stated.
PLD 2016
N/A

P L D 2016 Lahore 1

AWAIS YOUNAS — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 2015
N/A

2015 C L C 1477

MANSOOR SARWAR KHAN, Advocate High Court, President Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Central Region, Punjab — Petitioner Versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman, Islamabad

Court: Lahore
CLC 2019
2017-February-6

2019 C L C 938

Ms NAHEED KHAN — Petitioner Versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: Islamabad
CLC 2024
2024-January-4

2024 C L C 584

IMRAN AHMAD KHAN NIAZI — Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN ELECTRONIC MEDIA REGULATORY AUTHORITY and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1989
constitutional, Petitions Nos.2‑11 and 7‑11 of 1988, decided on 2nd October, 1988.

P L D 1989 Supreme Court 66

Mrs. BENAZIR BHUTTO and. another‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and another‑ ‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑Art. 17 ( 2)‑‑ Representation of the 'People, Act (LXXXV of 1976), S.21 as amended by Representation of the People (Amendment) Ordinance (II of 1985) and Representation of the .People (Fourth Amendment) Ordinance (VIII of 1985) ‑‑Provisions of S.21 of the Representation of the People Act, 1976, are violative of Fundamental Rights and in so far as it fails to recognize the existence and participation of the Political Parties in the process of elections particularly in the matter of allocation of symbols and is for that reason void to that extent.
MLD 2017
2015-November-19

2017 M L D 930

ZAHID MOHIBULLAH — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Secretary Local Government and 10 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar (D.I. Khan Bench)
PTD 1997
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 24 of 1995, decided on 4th April, 1996.

1997 P T D 1016

COMMON CAUSE, A REGISTERED SOCIETY Versus UNION OF INDIA and others

Court: 222 I T R 260
CLC 1989
Writ Petition No.216 of 1989, decided on 18th September, 1989.

1989 C L C 2456

Parliamentary Affairs, Government of N.‑W.F.P.‑‑Petitioner Versus THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through the Secretary, Ministry of Justice

Court: Peshawar
YLR 1999
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No of 1999, decided on 31st July, 1999.

1999 Y L R 2499

Sardar MUHAMMAD SAYYAB KHALID — Petitioner Versus Mohtrama BENAZIR BHUTTO and 39 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Shariat Court (A J & K)