Correction of name
Correction of name legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Application for correction of name was rejected by Additional District Collector with a direction to petitioner to approach Civil Court for correction of her name
Validity
Field staff of revenue department had reported that "Parveen Akhtar" and "Fehmeez Akhtar" were the names of one lady and the only difference was that in revenue record her name was recorded as "Parveen Akhtar" while in school certificate her name was "Fehmeez Akhtar"
No separate lady with the name as "Parveen Akhtar" existed
"Parveen Akhtar" was non-existent but her name had been incorporated in revenue record
Respondent was real brother of petitioner who had also not denied that petitioner was not his sister and daughter of his parents
Revenue authorities were supposed to keep record updated under S.172 of West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967
Board of Revenue set aside the orders passed by the Courts below as the Lower Courts had wrongly referred petitioner to Civil Courts
Board of Revenue directed revenue authorities to correct the record by replacing correct name of petitioner
Revision was allowed in circumstances.
"Correction of name", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124945175
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Correction of name"
2010 S C M R 194
ABDUL MUKTADAR and another — Petitioners Versus DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, JHANG and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2017 C L C Note 27
Mst. BAKHTAN MAI and 14 others — Petitioners Versus Mst. ANWAR MAI and 49 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)1986 M L D 2272
ZULFIQAR and others‑‑Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KHANEWAL and others‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2014 P L C (C
Syed IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN NASIR Versus PUNJAB PUBLIC SERVCE COMMISSION, LAHORE through Chairman and 6 others
Court: Lahore High Court2014 C L C 696
FEHMEEZ AKHTAR — Petitioner Versus REVENUE DEPARTMENT through District Collector, Narowal and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Board of Revenue Punjab1988 C L C 533
SALEEM ZIA‑‑Petitioner Versus Lt.‑Col. (Retd.) MOJIB,, DIRECTOR TECHNICAL,
Court: KarachiP L D 2025 Balochistan 18
BIBI FAREEDA — Petitioner Versus JAN BIBI — Respondent
Court: High Court1993 P Cr
FAZAL — Petitioner Versus SAJAWAL and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)1992 M L D 809
NISAR QUTUB‑‑‑Petitioner Versus RETURNING OFFICER‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore2020 P L C (C
MIRZA KHAN Versus DIRECTOR GENERAL NADRA ISLAMABAD and another
Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court