Home Maxims & Terms Determination of zar-e-soem meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Determination of zar-e-soem

Determination of zar-e-soem legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 CLC 706 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss. 24(1)(2), 27 & 28Determination of zar-e-soem

When no sale price is mentioned in mutation of sale deed, in that case court would ask for the deposit of 1/3rd of probable value of the suit property

In the present case the sale consideration was clearly fixed/mentioned in the mutation and also reflected in the plaint, thus the order of Trial Court for deposit of 1/3rd of zar-e-soem (pre-emption amount) was very clear, therefore, plaintiff was bound to deposit 1/3rd of sale amount and it was not discretion/sweet will to deposit 1/3rd of that amount which plaintiff presumed and claimed to be the sale consideration.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Determination of zar-e-soem", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124945178

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Determination of zar-e-soem"

CLC 2014
2013-March-8

2014 C L C 706

WAZIR MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus HAROON-UR-RASHID — Respondent

Court: Peshawar
YLR 2002
Writ Petition No.555 of 1992/BWP, decided on 31st January, 2002.

2002 Y L R 1580

GHULAM YASIN and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus DISTRICT JUDGE and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLCN 2017
2015-March-12

2017 C L C Note 60

MUHAMMAD SHAHID alias SHAHID AZIZ BAJWA — Appellant Versus NASIR IQBAL and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2013
2013-February-25

P L D 2013 Supreme Court 489

HASNAIN NAWAZ KHAN — Appellant Versus GHULAM AKBAR and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2006
2006-March-22

P L D 2006 Lahore 410

Mst. PARVEEN AKHTAR and another — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD SATTAR — Respondent

Court: High Court
MLD 2010
2010-June-29

2010 M L D 1560

GHULAM AKBAR — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 2019
N/A

P L D 2019 Lahore 153

MUHAMMAD TUFAIL — Petitioner Versus Mst. AKHTARI BEGUM — Respondent

Court: High Court
MLD 2024
the basis of any material/record, from the office of Sub-Registrar concerned, etc., related to similar properties to ascertain the sale price provided issues Nos.3 and 4 are decided along with remaining issues through the final judgment

2024 M L D 2013

Muhammad Saleem — Petitioner Versus Additional District Judge, Gujranwala and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLR 2005
N/A

2005 Y L R 269

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ TAHIR — Petitioner Versus SAID AKBAR — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 2012
2012-June-25

P L D 2012 Supreme Court 764

Hafiz MUHAMMAD RAMZAN — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD BAKHSH — Respondent

Court: High Court