Home Maxims & Terms Confirmation of auction meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Confirmation of auction

Confirmation of auction legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 CLC 739 BOARD-OF-REVENUE-PUNJAB Judicial Precedent
S. 8ReviewTemporary Lease SchemeConfirmation of auction

State land in question was put to open auction under Temporary Lease Scheme for five years and petitioner was the highest bidder in whose favour auction was also confirmed

Additional Commissioner (Consolidation) accepted time-barred appeal against auction in favour of petitioner and appeal of petitioner was dismissed by Board of Revenue

Validity

Respondent wanted to prolong his unauthorized possession over land in question, who had neither paid dues of government nor was allowing the auction of land to be successful and was distracting the matter into unnecessary litigation

Auction was held for a period of five years (2011 to 2016) and as a consequence of auction requisite mutation had already been sanctioned in favour of petitioner and possession of land was delivered to petitioner, who had deposited requisite amount in government treasury

Cancellation of such auction at belated stage would not only disturb the rights of petitioner but also cause loss to exchequer and that too for benefit of respondent, who was violator of law and encroached upon land in question in sheer violation of resumption order of District Collector, which was implemented on 15-8-2002

Order of Board of Revenue dated 24-6-2012, was set aside and order of District Officer (Revenue) dated 24-3-2011, was upheld

Review was allowed in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Confirmation of auction", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124945181

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Confirmation of auction"

CLD 2025
2025-March-12

2025 C L D 615

BASHIR AHMAD BHATTI and another — Appellants Versus ALBARAKA BANK PAKISTAN LTD. and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Rawalpindi Bench)
CLC 2015
2015-April-2

2015 C L C 1579

MUHAMMAD NAZIR and another — Petitioners Versus LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Director-General and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1984
1983-June-6

1984 C L C 2132

RIAZ HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AZHAR, COMMISSIONER, SARGODHA DIVISION,

Court: Lahore
CLD 2017
2017-March-14

2017 C L D 1158

FAYAZ ALI — Appellant Versus Dr. AHMAD KHAN HOTI and others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
SCMR 1991
‑‑‑‑S.8(3)‑‑‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), OXXI, R.92‑‑‑Supreme Court Rules, 1980, OXXVI, R.1‑‑‑Review of Supreme Court judgment‑‑‑Question raised was that as the power of Special Court constituted under Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans) Ordinance, 1979, in regard to execution of decrees passed by it is provided in S.8(3) of the. Ordinance itself, procedure provided for in Civil Procedure Code, 1908, was displaced as held by Supreme Court in the judgment under review; it was further contended that reservation of power by the Court of Confirmation of "auction" as distinguished from confirmation of "sale", both of which were within the amplitude of the power possessed by Court under S.8(3) of Ordinance XIX of 1979, were ignored and not given effect to, in holding that sale was to be governed throughout by provisions of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, overriding the express reservations‑‑‑Judgment under review had exhaustively dealt with the argument that had been advanced in support of review petition‑‑‑Assumption which lay at the foundation of the contention now raised, that the case was decided on the basis of provisions of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, was not well‑founded‑‑‑Question of confirmation of sale had been examined in the judgment under review in a much wider perspective including the general principle attracted in case of judicial sales‑‑ Review petitions being devoid of merit were dismissed in circumstances.

1991 S C M R 51

HUDAYBIA TEXTILE MILLS Ltd. and others‑‑Petitioners Versus ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN LTD. and others‑‑Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 1988
Writ Petition No.5804 of 1986, decided on 18th January, 1988.

1988 C L C 1771

SHER MUHAMMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER and others‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1991
Civil Review Petitions No.69-R of 1987 and 8-R of 1988, decided on 21st February, 1990.

1991 S C M R 1756

Messrs HUDAYBIA TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED and 8 others — Petitioners Versus ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN LIMITED and 7 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
YLR 2006
N/A

2006 Y L R 2776

SULTAN MAHMOOD — Petitioner Versus HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE CORPORATION, through District Manager and 3 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 2013
2012-October-8

2013 C L C 935

TANVEER AHMED BHATTI — Petitioner Versus TEHSIL MUNICIPAL OFFICER, GUJRAT — Respondent

Court: Lahore
CLC 1988
Writ Petition No. 426 of 1987, decided on 28th September, 1987.

1988 C L C 1186

AHMAD BAK HSH‑‑Petitioner Versus THE MEMBER COLONIES, BOARD OF REVENUE,

Court: Lahore