Home Maxims & Terms Return or rejection of plaint meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Return or rejection of plaint

Return or rejection of plaint legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2019 CLD 1060 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
O. VII, Rr. 10 & 11Return or rejection of plaintJurisdiction of courtScope

Plaint can only be rejected by a court which otherwise has jurisdiction to entertain suit/plaint and decide entire lis on its merits

If during such proceedings an application has been filed by defendant for rejection of plaint on grounds mentioned under O. VII, R. 11, C.P.C., court having such jurisdiction can decide application either way

Once it is pleaded on behalf of defendant that court has no jurisdiction and plaint be returned under O. VII, R. 10, C.P.C., then no application can be entertained under O. VII, R 11, C.P.C. by the same court

By filing such application defendant submits to jurisdiction of court and waives objections to that effect and therefore, cannot press upon an application under O. VII, R. 10, C.P.C. for return of plaint.

2017 PLD 678 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
S. 7Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.VII, R.10Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972), S.3High Court appealPecuniary jurisdictionReturn or rejection of plaintScope

Dispute between the parties was whether after determination of pecuniary jurisdiction plaint was to be returned or rejected

Validity

Suit filed by plaintiff was barred by virtue of S. 7 of Sindh Civil Courts Ordinance, 1962, for want of pecuniary jurisdiction

Court was either supposed to reject the plaint for want of pecuniary jurisdiction or it was to be returned to plaintiff

Rule of propriety demanded that when there was a Court having jurisdiction to try the suit and plaint was wrongly filed in another Court, which had 'no jurisdiction' either on the ground of pecuniary value of the suit or territorial limits, to be tried by Court where it was filed, instead of rejecting the plaint, such Court should return the plaint to plaintiff for presentation before a Court having both pecuniary and territorial jurisdiction, as if the suit had never been instituted; it was not the case of propriety alone, rather it was necessary to return the plaint because even order of 'rejection of plaint' was a case of implied exercise of jurisdiction by the Court in a case where cognizance was expressly barred by S.7 of Sindh Civil Courts Ordinance, 1962

Division Bench of High Court returned the plaint and allowed plaintiff to present the same before Court of competent jurisdiction resultantly order passed by Single Judge of High Court was set aside

High Court appeal was allowed in circumstances.

2014 YLR 1222 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
O. VII, Rr. 10 & 11Return or rejection of plaintScopePrayer of a plaint and facts pleaded were to be considered while applying O. VII, Rr. 10 and 11, C.P.C.Plaint could not be rejected partially or partially returned

Plaint in which there was a small point determinable by the civil court and major portion of cause of action or prayer was not within the jurisdiction of civil court, plaint could not be partially returned.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Return or rejection of plaint", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124945191

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Return or rejection of plaint"

MLD 2005
N/A

2005 M L D 1506

MURLIDHAR P. GANGWANI (ENGINEER) — Appellant Versus Engineer AFTAB ISLAM AGHA and others — Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 2017
2017-July-31

P L D 2017 Sindh 678

TRADING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (PVT) LTD. — Appellant Versus Messrs FRIENDS CORPORATION STEVEDORES (PVT.) LTD — Respondent

Court: High Court
CLD 2019
2018-July-24

2019 C L D 1060

SAMSONITE IP HOLDINGS S.a.r.l. through Attorney and another — Plaintiffs Versus FAMOUS BRANDS (PVT.) LIMITED — Defendant

Court: Sindh
PLD 2011
2011-June-22

P L D 2011 Lahore 569

Syeda ADRISH and another — Petitioners Versus Syed ANWAR-UL-HAQ and 2 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
MLD 1987
Civil Revision Application No.32 of 1979, decided on 13th October, 1986.

1987 M L D 454

AL-MEHRAN BUILDERS — Petitioner Versus KARACHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY and others — Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 2025
2024-August-19

P L D 2025 Balochistan 37

Mst. FARZANA (widow) and another — Petitioners Versus ABID KHAN and 2 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
MLD 1992
C.R. No.824 of 1981, decided on 17th August, 1992.

1992 M L D 2268

AZIZ AHMED and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus MUNIR AHMED and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1998
Civil Revision Application No.122 and Civil Miscellaneous Applications Nos.512 and 573 of 1992, decided on 1st September, 1994.

1998 C L C 1995

Dr. MUHAMMAD SALEEM KHAN‑‑‑Applicant Versus AMANULLAH KHAN‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
CLC 2012
N/A

2012 C L C 329

Mst. SIBGHAT IQBAL — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE NADEEM — Respondent

Court: Lahore
CLC 2019
2019-April-2

2019 C L C 1915

SALMAN FAZAL — Petitioner Versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT, SHEIKHUPURA and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore