Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Liability of abettor meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Liability of abettor

Liability of abettor legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 PCrLJ 852 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
S. 109AbetmentLiability of abettor

If a person had instigated another to perpetrate a particular crime and the other person in pursuance of such instigation, not only perpetrated that crime, but in the course of doing so, committed another crime in furtherance of such instigation, the former was criminally responsible as an abettor in respect of such last mentioned crime, if the person, at the time of the instigation, knew that in the ordinary course of things probably another crime had to be committed in order to carry out original crime.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Liability of abettor", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124945230

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Liability of abettor"

PLD 1984
Criminal Appeal No. 152/1, of 1983, decided on 1st November, 1983.

P L D 1984 Federal Shariat Court 55

MUBARAK ALI AND ANOTHER‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: ‑‑Ss. 10 & 16‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 109‑Zina‑Enticing or taking away a woman with intent to commit Zina‑Abetment- Liability of abettor, principle of‑Held : Abettor is liable for commis sion of offence in same manner as if it was done by him alone. Abetment.
PCRLJ 2014
2013-April-25

2014 P Cr

AAMIR alias NAVEED and another — Appellants Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Sindh
PLD 2008
merits so as to establish as to how and in which manner the offence was committed and facilitated by the respondent No.1, as to whether he had abetted the main offence or his role was limited to the extent of just securing commission and kickbacks for the principal offender, a part whereof was allegedly paid to him by said Jamil Ansari. It is also not clear as to how and on what 'count the amount in question was deposited in the accounts of those offshore companies which were statedly established for the purpose, because the person who had allegedly established the same was neither challaned by the NAB authorities, nor summoned, by the Court

P L D 2008 Supreme Court 697

NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU through Chairman — Appellant Versus AAMIR LODHI and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 2008
Jail Petition No.5(S) of 2006, decided on 11th December, 2007.

2008 S C M R 670

GUL NASEEB — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Shariat Appellate Bench
PLD 1971
Criminal Appeal No. 279 of 1967, decided on 22nd April 1971.

P L D 1971 Lahore 959

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN AND ANOTHER‑ — Appellants Versus THE STATE‑ — Respondent

Court:
PCRLJ 2013
2012-December-4

2013 P Cr

SARDAR KHAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1968
Petition No. 494 of 1967, decided on 31st May 1968.

P L D 1968 Karachi 853

ABDUL QADIR‑Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER, KHAIRPUR DIVISION AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court:
SCMR 2023
Criminal Appeal No. 39-K of 2022, Criminal M.A. No. 113-K of 2022 and Criminal Petition No. 613 of 2022, decided on 6th February, 2023.

2023 S C M R 870

Mst. HAJIRA BIBI alias SEEMA and others — Appellants Versus ABDUL QASEEM and another — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2009
2009-March-25

P L D 2009 Supreme Court 385

MAMARAS — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PCRLJ 2012
2012-June-14

2012 P Cr

ALTAF AHMED — Petitioner/Appellant Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library