Subsequent statement
Subsequent statement legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Any subsequent application made during the investigation to the police would neither be equated with the FIR nor as part of the FIR.
Report with subsequent statement made by complainant, could be treated as an improvement for falsely implicating the person, with due deliberation and consultation.
"Subsequent statement", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124945239
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Subsequent statement"
2011 Y L R 833
NAEEM SHAMSHED — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Karachi1986 P Cr
ALLAH WASAYA Petitioner Versus NEKA and 3 others‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2013 M L D 1615
SHUJAAT HASHMI alias SHUJA — Applicant Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: Sindh1979 S C M R 600
N. S. HOON‑Appellant Versus ADVOCATE‑GENERAL, SIND, KARACHI‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑ Art. 204‑Contempt of Court‑Attempts to influence a witness to discard his duty as a witness or to warp mind of a possible witness clear contempt of Court‑Contemner during pendency of civil suit filed by him in High Court asking complainant to withhold from inform ation about a certain meeting and promising him in return to be treated more favourably in criminal case filed against him (complainant) Complainant making two statements before Court, earlier statement being in form of laying information before Court, not intended to supply details and subsequent statement given as a witness‑Subsequent statement being quite detailed providing particulars, no discrepancy nor any improvement between two statements to be inferred Complainant's statement corroborated by circumstantial evidence and failure of contemner to appear in witness‑box or file any affidavit in disproof of allegations‑Account of meeting sought by contemner to be withheld having great relevancy to civil suit, contemner's motive to see complainant's evidence not damaging him spelt out Complainant's testimony having gone unrebutted and proved by circumstances, offence of contempt, held, made out‑High Court having made no mistake in believing complainant's statement, its view regarding credibility of complainant being not erroneous or based on no' evidence, no violation of any principle of law in matter of appreciation of evidence, nor any omission or misreading of record warranting interference by Supreme Court being pointed out, appeal dismissed.‑Contempt of Court.1995SCMR1178
MUHAMAMD JAVED and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2005 Y L R 2731
MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Lahore2022 Y L R Note 78
NAZAR MUHAMMAD and another — Applicants Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: Balochistan2007 P Cr
Master MUHAMMAD ASHIQ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Lahore2019 M L D 1342
MANIK and another — Applicants Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: Sindh (Hyderabad Bench)2007 P Cr
MAHBOOB ALI and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Karachi