Home Maxims & Terms Giving up material witnesses meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Giving up material witnesses

Giving up material witnesses legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 PCrLJ 744 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent
Art. 129(g)Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S.265-F(7)Giving up material witnesses

Where material witnesses would be given up by the prosecution, inference could be drawn that if they would have appeared in the court, they might have disclosed true picture of the incident with reference to the absence of accused from the place of occurrence

Prosecution was not legally bound to produce all the witnesses because it was the quality of the evidence, but not quantity which would matter

Defence was always at liberty to summon a prosecution witness, who had been given up with an object to unearth true facts before the court

Adverse presumption as covered under Art.129(g) of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984, could be drawn against accused that the given up witnesses were not ready to authenticate his plea of alibi.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Giving up material witnesses", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124945241

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Giving up material witnesses"

PLD 1979
Criminal Revision No. 59 of 1979, decided on 19th February 1979.

P L D 1979 Lahore 740

BARKAT ALI-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Court: Practice and procedur-Witness-Practice of Public Prosecutor in giving up eye-witness at an early stage of case and that of Sessions Court in too readily recording such a request strongly deprecated-Practice and procedure--Witness.
PCRLJ 2014
the basis of evidence available on record

2014 P Cr

MANZOOR HUSSAIN alias MAMA — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Balochistan
PCRLJ 1979
Criminal Revision No. 929 of 1978, decided on 30th June, 1979.

1979 P Cr

Rana IRSHAD ARMED KHAN — Petitioner Versus ABDUR RAHIM AND OTHERS — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 2017
2016-February-16

2017 P Cr

ZESHAN — Petitioner Versus MANZOOR AMAN and another — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
SCMR 2022
Jail Petition No. 42 of 2017, decided on 11th February, 2022.

2022 S C M R 864

ZAFAR KHAN and another — Petitioners Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PCRLJ 1986
Criminal Revision No. 52 of 1984, decided on 6th February, 1986.

1986 P Cr

Syed ANWAR ALI SHAH‑‑Petitioner Versus YAR MUHAMMAD and 3 others Respondents

Court: Karachi
MLD 2026
the whims and capricious of either of the parties. Furthermore, the departmental inquiry proceedings have no nexus/relevance with the trial of a criminal case and does not synchronize with criminal procedure code. Thus, we are of the view that the learned trial Court has rightly dismissed the application filed by the petitioner

2026 M L D 118

Muhammad Asif — Petitioner Versus The State and 2 another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLR 2006
Civil Revision No.601 of 2005, decided on 1st June, 2005.

2006 Y L R 855

MAZHAR IQBAL and 2 others — Petitioners Versus ALLAH DITTA — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLC(CS) 1984
Appeal No. GA‑348 of 1983, decided on 19th March, 1984.

1984 P L C 1320

AMANULLAH SHAH Versus UNIVERSAL OIL & VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS LTD., LAHORE

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab
PCRLJ 2025
2023-October-9

2025 P Cr

Muhammad Ijaz and another — Petitioners Versus The State and another — Respondents

Court: Peshawar