Suit for price
Suit for price legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Under the provision of S.55 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, where the property in goods had passed to the buyer or where the property in goods had not passed to the buyer but the price was payable on a day certain irrespective of delivery, the seller would be entitled to sue for the price of the goods.
"Suit for price", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124945506
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Suit for price"
P L D 1958 Karachi 686
MESSRS ARAG LTD.‑Appellant Versus MESSRS MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MUHAMMAD ASHRAF
Court:2014 C L D 625
Messrs ESSA ENGINEERING COMPANY PVT. LTD.and another — Appellants Versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANYLIMITED and another — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2014 S C M R 922
Messrs ESSA ENGINEERING COMPANY PVT. LTD. and another — Appellants Versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LIMITED and another — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1963 Dacca 886
KUMIR MONDAL AND OTHERS‑ — Appellants Versus PARAMATHA NATH CHOWDHURY AND OTHERS‑ — Respondents
Court: (a) Bengal Tenancy Act (VIII of 1885), S. 3 (17) proviso (as amended by Bengal Tenancy (Amendment) Act (IV of 1928) Proviso neither retrospective nor debars a bargadar from plea of tenancy‑Status to be determined with reference to circumstances of case: Abu Nasser Sayedullah v. Abdul Malik P L D 1960 Dacca 587 rel.1988 C L C 1927
IRSHAD‑UL‑HAQ‑‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD SALEEM and others‑ ‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1985 S C M R 426
ABDUL AZIZ and another‑‑Appellants Versus AKBAR KHAN‑‑Respondent
Court: High Court2016P233
AMIR SIYAB — Petitioner Versus SHER BAHADAR KHAN alias TOTA and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Peshawar2004 Y L R 437
MUHAMMAD YOUSAF and another — Petitioners Versus CIVIL JUDGE, SARGODHA and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1987 M L D 2878
ZAHOOR AHMAD — Petitioner Versus RIAZUDDIN and others — Respondents
Court: Board of Revenue Punjab1988 C L C 1751
Haji GHULAM RASOOL‑‑Appellant Versus ALI AHMAD‑‑Respondent.
Court: Lahore