Home Maxims & Terms Seizure of property meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Seizure of property

Seizure of property legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 MLD 1059 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Ss. 523 & 550Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199Constitutional petitionSeizure of propertyProcedure by police upon impounding of propertyPetitioner had purchased the car from complainantDispute of civil natureScope

Seized car had neither been forcibly snatched nor found involved in the commission of any offence and the police was not justified in seizing the same from the house of petitioner

Police did not obtain any warrant from the concerned Magistrate to enter into house of petitioner

Conduct of police officer was highly deplorable

Nobody could be allowed to enter into house, there was no reasonable ground that petitioner had committed any offence and in this regard nothing even had been brought on record

High Court directed to hand over the custody of seized car to the petitioner.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Seizure of property", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124945508

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Seizure of property"

SCMR 1991
Civil Appeals Nos. 28-P and 29-P of 1987, decided on 20th March, 1991.

1991 S C M R 1413

GOVERNMENT OF N-W.F.P. — Appellant Versus Dr. S. HAIDER BUKHARI and others — Respondents

Court: ----S. 523---Seizure of property---Responsibility of police and duty and liability of Magistrate---Responsibility of Police Officer under the law would only extend to report seizure of property found, inter alia, under circumstances which had created suspicion of commission of any offence to make a report to Magistrate-- Such seizure having been reported Magistrate would take proceedings for disposal of property whether owner thereof was known or unknown-- Magistrate's such action would be protected, with the result that no suit for damages would lie if he had acted in good faith---When there was no allegation of want of good faith on the part of Magistrate and when he had not been impleaded as party to suit for damages, no suit for claim for damages would be against the Government.---Damages.
PCRLJ 2007
2007-June-13

2007 P Cr

AKHTAR HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1984
Constitutional Petition No. D‑1006 of 1981, decided on 27th September, 1983.

P L D 1984 Karachi 71

MUHAMMAD MUSLIM‑Petitioner Versus FEDERAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY‑‑Respondent

Court:
PCRLJ 2011
2010-May-11

2011 P Cr

Mst. AZRA SULTANA — Petitioner Versus GHULAM ASGHAR JATOI and others — Respondents

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 1969
Criminal Revision Application No. 156 of !968, decided on 9th December 1968.

1969 P Cr

BALIGH AHMAD AND 2 OTHERS — Applicants Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
MLD 2000
Writ Petition No.23046 of 1999, heard on 21st December, 1999.

2000 M L D 837

Haji MUHAMMAD JALAL‑‑‑Petitioner Versus IJAZ AHMAD BAJWA, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FEDERAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY, STATE BANK CIRCLE, LAHORE and 3 others‑‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 2023
2022-February-9

2023 P Cr

MUHAMMAD ZAMAN — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
MLD 2014
merits while providing equivalent opportunity of being heard

2014 M L D 1059

GHULAM ARIF KHAN — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Home Secretary and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
PCRLJ 1968
Criminal Revision No. 1019 of 1967, decided on 6th March 1968.

1968 P Cr

C. M. SAFDAR‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1995
1995-July-25

1995 P Cr

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN — Petitioner Versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION BAGHBANPURA, LAHORE and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore