Home Maxims & Terms Written agreement meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Written agreement

Written agreement legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 MLD 1012 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Art.103Written agreementExclusion of oral evidenceScope

Oral evidence could not be preferred over the documentary evidence.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Written agreement", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124945510

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Written agreement"

CLC 2010
2009-March-2

2010 C L C 583

ABDUR RASHEED — Petitioner Versus DUBEER AHMED and 12 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLD 2005
R.F.A. No‑595 of 1999, heard on .4th June, 2004.

2005 C L D 292

HABIB BANK LIMITED‑‑‑Appellant Versus Messrs THE ENGLISH ENGINEERING COMPANY and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 2003
Regular First. Appeal No.8 of 1995, heard on 14th March, 2002.

2003 M L D 131

Qazi MUHAMMAD SAQIB KHAN‑‑‑Appellant Versus GHULAM ABBAS and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1990
Judicial Miscellaneous No. 13 and Suit No. 185 of 1988, decided on 19th February, 1990.

P L D 1990 Karachi 216

through Sole Proprietor‑‑Applicants Versus Messrs NEPTUNE TEXTILE MILLS

Court: ‑‑‑S. 2(a)‑‑‑Arbitration agreement‑‑‑Meaning, scope and import of‑‑‑Arbitration agreement means written agreement to submit present or future differences to arbitration, whether an arbitrator was named therein or not‑‑‑Use of word "Arbitrator" or "Arbitration Agreement" in the document was not necessary‑‑ Arbitration Act although requires Agreement of Arbitration to be in writing, it does not require that it should be contained in a formal document‑‑‑Such an agreement may be in any form attributed to the parties whereby their intention to refer their dispute to Arbitration is manifestly proved in accordance with law‑‑‑Correspondence between the parties or a statement made by their counsel recorded by Court would be considered sufficient to be treated as an Arbitration Agreement.‑‑Words and phrases.
CLC 1987
First Rent Appeal No.41 of 1983, decided on 1st October, 1986

1987 C L C 144

ABDULLAH‑‑Appellant Versus HIGHWAY GOODS TRANSPORT‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
MLD 1987
Writ Petition No.1475 of 1983, decided on 27th February, 1984.

1987 M L D 2419

Ch. ATTA MUHAMMAD GHUMMAN — Petitioner Versus DISTRICT JUDGE and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1995
Writ Petition No. 13724 of 1994, decided on 6th December, 1994.

1995 C L C 950

ABDUL HAMID‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 2006
Regular Second Appeal No.171 of 2004, decided on 30th May, 2005.

2006 C L C 669

ARIF ALI alias MUHAMMAD ARIF — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM and another-Respondents

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1996
Civil Appeal No. 516 of 1992, decided on 16th October, 1995.

1996SCMR336

BINYAMEEN and 3 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus Chaudhry HAKIM and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
YLR 2013
Civil Revision No.1261 of 2013, decided on 14th May, 2013.

2013 Y L R 2178

ZUBAIDA BIBI — Petitioner Versus ZULFIQAR and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore