Home Maxims & Terms Dismissal of suit for default meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Dismissal of suit for default

Dismissal of suit for default legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 YLR 1388 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
O.IX, R.8 & O.XVII, Rr.2 & 3Dismissal of suit for defaultDate of hearing

Suit had been dismissed for default of appearance on a date not fixed for hearing but for attendance of plaintiff or his counsel

Order of dismissal

Validity

Court could dismiss a case for non-prosecution when, the case was fixed for hearing

Case fixed for any other collateral purposes other than hearing could not be dismissed

Provision of O.XVII, Rr.2 & 3, C.P.C. would come into play, in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Dismissal of suit for default", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124945608

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Dismissal of suit for default"

PLD 1981
Civil Revision No. 454 of 1979, decided on 6th December 1980.

P L D 1981 Lahore 339

ALTAF HUSSAIN AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD‑Respondent

Court:
YLR 2001
Revision Application No. 104 of 2000, decided on 16th May, 2001.

2001 Y L R 426

Haji AHMAD ASSOCIATES — Applicant Versus COTTON EXPORT CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN LTD. — Respondent

Court: Karachi
CLC 2023
2022-September-19

2023 C L C 963

KHALID IQBAL and others — Petitioners Versus Mst. YASEEN and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1995
Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 869 of 1994 in Suit No. 490 of 1992, decided on 6th November, 1994.

1995 C L C 461

Messrs CIBA‑GEIGY (PAK.) LIMITED‑‑‑Applicant Versus MUHAMMAD SAFDAR‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLD 1981
Civil Revision No. 242 of 1980, decided on 17th June, 1981.

P L D 1981 Peshawar 151

ZAFAR ALI KHAN AND 6 OTHERS‑Appellants/Petitioners Versus Haji MUHAMMAD ZAMAN‑Respondent/Plaintiff

Court: 0. IX, r. 1‑Appearance of parties‑Word "hearing" in O. IX, r. 1 Not without significance‑Defendants being called upon to answer means his being called upon to answer to allegations made by plaintiff in plaint, whether he accedes to allegations or denies same and would like to contest suit‑Contention that case having been fixed for mere appearance of defendant, plaintiff or for that matter both parties not meant to be heard on such date, held, not correct‑Ghulam Sakina v. Karim Bakhsh P L D 1970 Lah. 412 and Rahim Bux v. Gul Muhammad P L D 1971 Lah. 746 held not applicable.‑Interpretation of statutes.
SCMR 1981
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 706 of 1980, decided on 5th November, 1980. (On appeal front judgment dated 24-3-1980 of the Lahore High Court in Civil Revision No. 846 of 1979).

1981S C M R 313

NASEEM SHAFI AND ANOTHER Petitioners Versus TANVIR AFFANDI AND 13 OTHERS-Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1993
Civil Revision No.332 of 1992, heard on 7th June, 1993.

P L D 1993 Lahore 564

MAHMOOD ARIF ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, AUQAF ‑‑‑ Respondent

Court:
PLD 1971
Civil Revision No. 424 of 1965, decided on 3rd February 1971.

P L D 1971 Lahore 746

RAHIM BUX AND ANOTHER‑ — Petitioners Versus GUL MUHAMMAD AND 2 OTHERS‑‑‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1971
Civil Revision No. 315 of 1965, decided on 28th January 1971.

P L D 1971 Lahore 690

SARDAR AND ANOIHER‑ — Petitioners Versus SULTAN AND 3 OTHERS‑ — Respondents

Court:
MLD 1996
1995-September-14

1996 M L D 51

MUHAMMAD AKHTAR — Petitioner Versus Mst. RAZIA BEGUM and others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar