Possession of firearm
Possession of firearm legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
In such circumstances joint reading of Ss. 8 & 23 of Sindh Arms Act, 2013 showed that offence alleged did not fall within the prohibitory clause of S. 497, Cr.P.C.
Accused was granted bail accordingly.
"Possession of firearm", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124945644
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Possession of firearm"
P L D 1960 (W
MUHAMMAD KHURSHID‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: (a) Evidence Act (I of 1872), Ss. 11, 43 & 155 (a)‑Accused charged with possession of firearm and ammunition without licence‑Prosecution alleging that accused was crossing border from Indian side and arrested‑Story of crossing border deposed to by same set of witnesses disbelieved by another Court in another case‑Judgment of that Court not relevant in so far as charge for possession of firearm in former case was concerned Judgment not relevant under S. 155. (a) either‑ Mir Jawali v. Emperor A I R 1936 Pesh. 106 ref..2021 P Cr
MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE — Applicant Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: Sindh2014 Y L R 1769
RAJAB — Applicant Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: Sindh2020 M L D 512
WALI MUHAMMAD and another — Appellants Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: Sindh (Sukkur Bench)P L D 1976 Peshawar 26
THE STATE‑Petitioner Versus SHAH MUHAMMAD‑Respondent
Court: High Court2014 Y L R 1372
INAYAT ALI — Applicant Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: SindhP L D 1953 Lahore 598
SHAH NAWAZ AND OTHERS‑ Convicts -Appellants Versus THE CROWN‑Respondent
Court:2017 M L D 978
IFTIKHAR — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: Sindh2019 S C M R 1332
HAMID MOHAMED AHMED ALI REHAIF — Petitioner Versus UNITED STATES — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of the United States*P L D 2019 Islamabad 483
TAHIR ATTIQUE ZARIF — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: High Court