Home Maxims & Terms Initial allowance meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Initial allowance

Initial allowance legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 PTD 1303 INLAND REVENUE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL OF PAKISTAN Judicial Precedent
S.23FBR Circular No.4 of 1963 dated 15-11-1963Initial allowanceHeavy vehiclesSuzuki vanFork lifter

Taxpayer contended that initial allowance was allowable on heavy vehicles used for the purpose of business; and was added during the year; and otherwise fork lifter was an item of the category of 'plant and machinery' and the same was eligible for initial allowance under S.23 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001

Validity

F.B.R. Circular No.4 of 1963 had been issued under the repealed Income Tax Act and was protected under the repealed Income Tax Ordinance, 1979

No such protection was available under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001

Initial depreciation was not allowable on Suzuki van

Fork lifter was not a road transport vehicle but was plant and machinery directly plied and used for business purpose and allowance as provided under S.23 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 was applicable

Appellate Tribunal directed to allow initial depreciation on fork lifter.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Initial allowance", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124945647

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Initial allowance"

PTD 2022
Civil Petitions Nos.2597 to 2600 of 2020, decided on 1st February, 2022.

2022 P T D 1109

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL) Versus Messrs ASKARI BANK LIMITED, RAWALPINDI and others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2022
Civil Petitions Nos.2597 to 2600 of 2020, decided on 1st February, 2022.

2022 S C M R 1104

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL) — Petitioner Versus Messrs ASKARI BANK LIMITED, RAWALPINDI and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 2012
I.T.As. Nos.957/IB, 958/IB; 515/IB, 150/IB and 151/IB of 2012, decided on 13th March,

2012 P T D (Trib

Messrs BGP (PAKISTAN) INTERNATIONAL, ISLAMABAD Versus C.I.R., L.T.U., ISLAMABAD

Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal of Pakistan
PTD 2020
I.T.Rs. Nos. 24 to 27 of 2009, decided on 16th July, 2020.

2020 P T D 2119

Messrs ASKARI BANK LIMITED, RAWALPINDI Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL), LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT, ISLAMABAD and others

Court: Islamabad High Court
PTD 2009
I.T.As. Nos. 4943/LB and 5929/LB of 2005, decided on 2nd. May, 2009.

2009 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 2011
I.T.A. No.589/IB of 2009, decided on 15th February, 2011.

2011 P T D (Trib

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL DIVISION), ISLAMABAD Versus Messrs WARID TELECOM (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE and 2 others

Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal of Pakistan
PTD 2010
I.T.A. No.1233/LB of 2008, decided on 21st January, 2010.

2010 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal of Pakistan
PCRLJ 2004
2003-December-13

2004 P Cr

SHAFIQUE AHMED — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
MLD 2016
2015-January-22

2016 M L D 314

PORDIL KHAN — Petitioner Versus STATE through Advocate General, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and 11 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
PTD 2014
I.C.A. No.770 of 2013, decided on 26th March, 2014.

2014 P T D 1530

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE Versus Rana RIASAT TUFAIL and others

Court: Lahore High Court