Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Admiralty Law meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Admiralty Law

Admiralty Law legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 PTD 1428 INLAND REVENUE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL OF PAKISTAN Judicial Precedent

Admiralty or maritime activity is a distinct subject, comprising of both domestic law governing maritime activities, and private international law which deals with matters including marine commerce, marine navigation, shipping, sailors, and the transportation of passengers and goods by sea

Admiralty also covers some land based commercial activities that are maritime in character.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Admiralty Law", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124945648

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Admiralty Law"

YLR 1999
Admiralty Suit No.8 of 1999, decided on 16th February, 1999.

1999 Y L R 989

ARMOR SHIPPING AGENT‑‑‑Appellant Versus M.V. RUBIN ‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
MLD 2010
7010-March-1

2010 M L D 1047

Messrs NEW JUBLIEE INSURANCE CO. LTD. — Plaintiff Versus Messrs SHENZHOU SHIPPING LTD. and 3 others — Defendants

Court: Karachi
CLC 1999
Admiralty Suit No.699 of 1995, decided on 9th January, 1999.

1999 C L C 996

SIKANDAR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus M.T. EASTERN NAVIGATER and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 2018
2018-April-13

P L D 2018 Sindh 569

CRESS LPG (PVT) LTD. through Authorised Representative — Plaintiff Versus M.T. MARIA III through Master/Chief Engineer/Chief Officer and others — Defendants

Court: High Court
PLD 2025
2024-October-4

P L D 2025 Sindh 335

Messrs TRANSFAR LOS ANGELES PTE LTD. through authorized representative — Appellant Versus M. V. "TSS AMBER" through Master/Chief Officer and 2 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2020
merits rather than lying dormant or hanging around without any lawful purpose and justification---Continuance of action in High Court was not to operate as an injustice to defendants, who had failed to make out a case that plaintiff did not disclose a cause of action or that the suit was frivolous, vexatious and or oppressive to them or it amounted to an abuse of process of the Court---High Court set aside the order passed by Trial Court---Appeal was allowed accordingly

P L D 2020 Sindh 568

SAJID PLASTIC FACTORY through Sole Proprietor — Appellant Versus MSC BAHAMAS through Master/Chief Officer and 9 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLD 2020
2019-August-29

2020 C L D 70

Messrs SING FUELS PTE LTD.through Duly Authorized Attorney — Plaintiff Versus M.V. YASA AYSEN and 4 others — Defendants

Court: Sindh
CLD 2018
2018-April-13

2018 C L D 972

CRESS LPG (PVT) LTD. through Authorised Representative — Plaintiff Versus M.T. MARIA III through Master/Chief Engineer/Chief Officer and others — Defendants

Court: Sindh
CLD 2013
2012-July-30

2013 C L D 362

F.T. SELNES — Appellant Versus MEGA INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANK and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
CLC 2020
2019-February-25

2020 C L C 454

PAKISTAN NATIONAL SHIPPING CORPORATION and 9 others — Plaintiffs Versus Messrs CONISTON LIMITED through Principal Officer and another — Defendants

Court: Sindh

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library