Home Maxims & Terms Lack of awareness meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Lack of awareness

Lack of awareness legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 PLD 699 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Arts. 20, 33, 36 & 184(3) & PreambleSuo motu action by the Supreme Court under Art. 184(3) of the ConstitutionRights of minoritiesReligious rightsLack of awarenessDesecration of places of worship belonging to minoritiesForced conversion of non-Muslims to Islam

Supreme Court observed that under the Constitution minorities had a special status; that the very genesis of Pakistan was grounded in the protection of the religious rights of all, especially those of minorities; that the incidents of desecration of places of worship of minorities could be warded off if the authorities concerned had taken preventive measures at the appropriate time; that the inaction on the part of law enforcement agencies was on account of the lack of proper understanding of the relevant law; that there was a general lack of awareness about minority rights among the people and those entrusted with enforcement of law were also not fully sensitized to such issue; that desecration of places of worship of even a non-Muslim was an offence under the Pakistan Penal Code, 1860; that it would be counter intuitive if the right to freedom of religion enshrined in Art.20 of the Constitution was interpreted in a manner which had the effect of encroaching upon religious freedoms of minority religions in the country

Suo motu case was disposed of accordingly.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Lack of awareness", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124945675

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Lack of awareness"

PLD 1984
Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 380 of 1983, decided on 17th December, 198?,.

P L D 1984 Supreme Court 192

ZIA-UL-HASSAN-Petitioner Versus THB STATE-Respondent

Court:
PLD 2025
6th December,

P L D 2025 Sindh 36

CANTONMENT BOARD CLIFTON through duly Authorized Officer — Appellant Versus NADIM AHMED ANSARI — Respondent

Court: High Court
PCRLJ 1989
Criminal Bail Applications Nos, 968 and 969 of 1988, decided on 15th December, 1988.

1989 P Cr

TOTAL and others‑‑Applicants Versus THE STATE‑ Respondent

Court: Karachi
SCMR 2013
Constitution Petition No.43 of 2009, decided on 22nd March, 2011.

2013 S C M R 187

Dr. MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAKI and another — Petitioners Versus SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (OPERATION), RAWALPINDI and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1963
2nd March 1963, District Sukkur

P L D 1963 W

GUL MUHAMMAD‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: High Court
PCRLJ 1988
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 647 of 1986, decided on 1st June, 1987.

1988 P Cr

MANGIO‑‑Applicant Versus ALLAH RAKHIO and another‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 1986
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 578 of 1985 and Criminal Suo Motu Revision No 16 of 1986, decided on 24th August, 1986.

P L D 1986﷓Karachi 633

FAKIR MUHAMMAD‑Applicant Versus MEERAN BUX AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court:
YLR 2002
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 5232/B(C) of 2001, decided on 15th November, 2001.

2002 Y L R 13

SHAHID IQBAL — Petitioner Versus RIAZ AHMAD and 5 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLC 2018
Revision Application No. HYD-17 of 2016, decided on 19th May, 2016.

2018 P L C 80

Mian ABDUL AZIZ Versus PRESIDING OFFICER and 2 others

Court: Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal
MLD 2005
2005-February-17

2005 M L D 702

KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION LTD. — Appellant Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through SECRETARY, IRRIGATION AND POWER, KARACHI and others — Respondents

Court: Karachi