Home Maxims & Terms Purposive interpretation meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Purposive interpretation

Purposive interpretation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2023 PLD 42 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Purposive interpretation

Principles relating to interpretation of the Constitution stated.

2021 SCMR 2019 SUPREME-COURT-OF-CANADA Judicial Precedent
Purposive interpretation

Purposive interpretation of Fundamental rights must begin with, and be rooted in, the text and not overshoot the purpose of the right but place it in its appropriate linguistic, philosophic and historical contexts.

2021 PLD 171 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Purposive interpretation

Provision of a statute inserted through an amendment could not be construed in a way so as to wipe out the entire statute, unless the legislature by express words or necessary intendment intended to give such an effect to newly provided law

Law Commission in England while giving the report in 1969 had not approved use of the word "mischief" and had instead preferred "a purposive approach to construction of statutes.

2021 PLD 166 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Purposive interpretationStatute not providing right to appeal/revision

Where statute did not provide any right to appeal/revision before High Court, the purpose was to give finality to the order passed under the statute and in such case High Court would not be justified in interfering with such order under Art. 199 of the Constitution.

2021 PLD 378 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Purposive interpretationScope

Interpretation which advances purpose of an Act is to be preferred rather than the interpretation which defeats its object.

2018 SCMR 1885 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Purposive interpretationPurposive rather than a literal approach to interpretation was to be adopted while interpreting statutes

Interpretation which advanced the purpose of the Act was to be preferred rather than an interpretation which defeated its objects.

2015 SCMR 1303 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Purposive interpretation

Courts always preferred a purposive rather than a literal interpretation of statutory instruments.

2014 PLD 583 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Purposive interpretation

Interpretation of a statute must be fashioned in a manner that advanced the purpose of the statute.

2014 PLD 583 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 6Member of the National Tariff CommissionTenure of officeThree years "unless otherwise directed by the Federal Government"Purposive interpretation

Phrase "Unless otherwise directed by the Federal Government" appearing at the start of S. 6 of National Tariff Commission Act, 1990 meant that at best the Federal Government was empowered to appoint a person for less than three years, if circumstances so required.

2014 PLC(CS) 1326 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Purposive interpretation

Interpretation of a statute must be fashioned in a manner that advanced the purpose of the statute.

2014 PLC(CS) 1326 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 6Member of the National Tariff CommissionTenure of officeThree years "unless otherwise directed by the Federal Government"Purposive interpretation

Phrase "Unless otherwise directed by the Federal Government" appearing at the start of S. 6 of National Tariff Commission Act, 1990 meant that at best the Federal Government was empowered to appoint a person for less than three years, if circumstances so required.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Purposive interpretation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124945890

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Purposive interpretation"

MLD 2015
2014-December-4

2015 M L D 995

NATIONAL SILK AND RAYON MILLS — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2015
2015-January-26

P L D 2015 Islamabad 81

MUHAMMAD FAROOQ KHAN — Appellant Versus EXCEL-LABS, through Central Executive Officer and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 2024
2023-October-5

2024 C L C 375

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, HAFIZABAD and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2025
N/A

P L D 2025 Lahore 795

IMRAN AHMAD KHAN NIAZI — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary,Home Department and 4 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2014
N/A

P L D 2014 Lahore 583

M.I. SANITARY STORE through Proprietor and another — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Commerce and 2 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
MLD 2015
3-2-2014; Multan Electric Power Company Ltd. through Chief Executive and another v. Muhammad Ashiq and others PLD 2006 SC 328; Water and Power Development Authority and others v. Messrs Kamal Food (Pvt.) Ltd. Okara and others PLD 2012 SC 371; Brig. Sher Ali Baz and another v. The Secretary, Establishment Division and others PLD 1991 SC 143; Capital Development Authority through Chairman and another v. Zahid Iqbal and another PLD 2004 SC 99; Shafaatullah Qureshi v. Federation of Pakistan PLD 2001 SC 142; Allied Bank of Pakistan Ltd. v. The Wafaqi Mohtasib (Ombudsman) and others PLD 2001 Kar. 203; Rahat Hussain v. Collector of Customs (Prev.), Customs House, Karachi and 2 others 2003 CLC 1860; The Prince Glass Works Ltd. v. National Beverages Ltd. and another PLD 1987 Kar. 49; Samina Anwaar Ullah Khan v. General Manager, SNGPL, Lahore PLD 2012 Lah. 554; Secretary Wafaqi Mohtasib and 6 others v. Capital Steel Re-Rolling Mills through Partner and 2 others PLD 2012 Lah. 493; American Constitution Law; Reading Law -- The Interpretation of Legal Texts; Foreword to Harvard Law Review 2002; Pepper v. Hart, (1993) 1 All ER 42, 50; Gadoon Textile Mills v. WAPDA 1997 SCMR 641; Anderson v. Ryan (1985) 2 All ER 355, 359; College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan v. Wafaqi Mohtasib and others PLD 2003 Kar. 667; Tariq Majeed Chaudhry v. Lahore Stock Exchange (Guarantee) Ltd. through President and 3 others PLD 1995 Lah. 572; Sindh Industrial Trading Estate Ltd. v. Provincial Ombudsman and others 1993 SCMR 948; Maxwell on Interpretation; Regulating public Utilities and Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority through Executive Engineer MEPCO Ltd. v. Messrs Husnain Industries (Pvt.) Ltd. through Managing Director Amir Azwar Khan and 3 others 2005 MLD 1979 ref

2015 M L D 1029

SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINE LTD. through Authorized Attorney — Petitioner Versus WAFAQI MOHTASIB and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
SCMR 2019
Criminal Appeal No. 94 of 2019, decided on 8th April, 2019.

2019 S C M R 930

KHAIR-UL-BASHAR — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2009
2008-November-19

P L D 2009 Lahore 240

Ch. MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE, ADVOCATE, — Appellant Versus CANTONMENT EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CHUNIAN, DISTRICT KASUR and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
PTD 2026
I.T.R. No.32 of 2020, decided on 11th June, 2025.

2026 P T D 45

PAKISTAN MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED (PMCL) Versus COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-IV) LARGE TAXPAYERS, UNIT, ISLAMABAD and others

Court: Islamabad High Court
PLC(CS) 2006
Appeal No.218 of 2002, decided on 25th July, 2005.

2006 P L C (C

Prof. MUHAMMAD WALI KHAN Versus HAMDARD UNIVERSITY and others

Court: Federal Service Tribunal