Religious endowment
Religious endowment legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Hindu law-Religious endowment- Grant to diety-Surplus cannot be claimed by special trustee.
Religious endowment-No document to throw light: on nature or terms of endowment- Court can rely on other documentary evidence to know nature of endowment-Grant-Mere appropriation of surplus by certain persons cannot give them title to beneficial interest in surplus.
"Religious endowment", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124946430
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Religious endowment"
P L D 1966 Dacca 505
ACHYUTANANDA MITRA CHOWDHURY AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus PRAFULLA KUMAR CHOWDHURY AND ANOTHER‑Opposite‑Parties
Court:P L D 1968 Karachi 557
HYDERABAD THROUGH ITS SECRETARY‑ — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court:1989 S C M R 1605
EVACUEE TRUST PROPERTY BOARD‑‑Appellant Versus RAHIM KHAN and 3 others Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1978 Karachi 406
Fakir Maulvi ABDUL HALIM‑Applicant Versus Haji DARYA KHAN (REPRESENTED BY HIS LEGAL HEIRS) — Respondent
Court:P L D 1947 Privy Council 304
N. SANKARANARAYANA PILLAYAN and others-Appellants Versus THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS FOR THE HINDU RELIGIOUS ENDOWMENTS, MADRAS, and another-Respondents
Court:P L D 1978 Karachi 252
EVACUEE DISTRICT TRUST COMMITTEE, HYDERABAD -Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL AND 2 OTHERS ‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑ Vol. V, Ch. 1‑A, r. 4 read with Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S. 5‑‑ Condonation of delay‑Appeal posted for kutcha peshi and for orders on application under S. 5, Limitation Act, 1908 Appeal being admitted in spite of application for condonation of delay and notice ordered to issue to respondent, respondent if urging for dismissal of appeal on ground of limitation, appellant. held, entitled to explain delay.‑Appeal (civil)‑Limitation.P L D 1959 (W
SHAFI MUHAMMAD‑‑Applicant Versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIK‑Opponent
Court:2005 Y L R 223
MUHAMMAD RAMZAN — Petitioner Versus ZAHIDA PERVEEN and 4 others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1949 Privy Council 263
ZAKKA PATTABHIRAMI REDDI-Appellant Versus MENAKUR BALARAMI REDDI and others-Respondents
Court:1981 C L C 1326
PREMIER INSURANCE COMPANY OF PAKISIAN LTD., LAHORE‑Petitioner Versus Mian SHEIH AHMAD‑Respondent
Court: Lahore