Home Maxims & Terms Purdanashin woman meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Purdanashin woman

Purdanashin woman legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1948 PLD 40 PRIVY-COUNCIL Judicial Precedent

Purdanashin woman-Agreement with-When voidable. Where the respondent (purdanashin woman) signed the docu­ment while under the appellant's influence and protection and without independent advice when she was suffering great distress and was unfit to understand how adversely her rights were affected by it, and that in fact she did not understand its meaning and legal consequences.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Purdanashin woman", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124946548

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Purdanashin woman"

PLD 1948
Privy Council Appeal No. 18 of 1946, decided on 23rd February 1948, from Bombay.

P

PAR I KH ATMARAM MANEKLAL-Appellant Versus BAI HIRA alias SHANTA, widow of SHAH BALABHAI ATMARAM-Respondent

Court:
YLR 1999
High Court Appeal No.86 of 1981, decided on 28th January, 1999.

1999 Y L R 728

ZAHEERUDDIN PATHAN through Legal Heirs and 8 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus Mst. HAJIANI ZAINAB through Legal Heirs and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 1990
Civil Petition tot Leave to Appeal No. 133‑R of 1989, decided on 15th May, 1989.

SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN

GHULAM ALI and 2 others‑‑ Petitioners Versus Mst. GHULAM SARWAR NAQVI‑‑ Respondent

Court: ‑‑Art. 1,44 ‑‑‑ Adverse possession ‑‑‑ Co‑sharer ‑‑‑ Ouster ‑‑‑ Adverse entry and non participation in the profits of the property would not amount to an ouster of co -sharer ‑‑‑ Wrong mutation confers no right in property as Revenue record is maintained only for purposes of ensuring realization of land revenue ‑‑‑ Co -sharers /co‑owners are not obliged to file a suit to seek a declaration to the effect that a mutation had wrongly been sanctioned‑‑Suit filed, due to denial of rights of the co‑sharer, for declaration would be within time and the Revenue Authorities on it success of such suit would be required by law to correct the Wrong mutation.‑‑Co‑sharer.
PLD 1976
3rd May 1976

P L D 1976 Supreme Court 629

AMINULLAH-Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan