Settlement of scheme
Settlement of scheme legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
S. 92-Settlement of scheme-Removal of existing head of institution-Discretion of Court.
"Settlement of scheme", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124946554
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Settlement of scheme"
P L D 1948 Privy Council 123
GURUNATHARUDHASWAMI GURU SHIDHARUDHASWAMI-Appellant Versus BHIMAPPA GANGADHARAPPA DIVATE and another-Respondents
Court:P L D 2019 Supreme Court 730
SIKANDAR HAYAT KHAN JOGAZAI and others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD HASHIM and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1982 Lahore 831
Before Ghazanfar Ali Gondal and Fazal‑i‑Mahmood, JJ Versus SARDAR IRSHADUL HASSAN AND 7 others ‑Respondents Writ Petition No. 1843/R of 1976, decided on 29th August, 1982.
Court: Art. 199 ‑‑ Writ ‑ Estoppel ‑ Petitioner cannot be allowed to reprobate what he bad approbated before Tribunal below.‑Estoppel.P L D 1969 Lahore 743
UMAR DIN AND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN AND OTHERS Respondents
Court:P L D 1975 Lahore 1267
Mst. SARDAR BEGUM‑Petitioner Versus AFTAB AHMAD KHAN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court:P L D 1966 (W
AHSANULLAH KHAN‑Petitioner Versus CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, WEST PAKISTAN‑Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 1972 Lahore 306
Mst. Hajan NAWAB BIBI‑Petitioner Versus SETTLEMENT AUTHORITIES (SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER LANDS) LAHORE AND ANOTHERS‑Respondents
Court:P L D 1955 Dacca 96
SWAMI TURIANANDA alias DINESH CHANDRA GUHA MUSTAFI and another‑Defendants‑ — Appellants Versus SISIR KUMAR SEN‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1974 Peshawar 58
LT: COL. S. M. JAHANDUR‑Appellant Versus SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER (LANDS), PESHAWAR AND 5 OTHERE‑Respondents
Court: High Court1981 S C M R 1025
NAWAB ALI AND OTHBRS-Petitioners Versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS-.-Respondents
Court: Sched. I read with Settlement Schemes Nos. I & VIII-Petitioner not applying for transfer of disputed property under Scheme No. I but seeking transfer under Scheme No. VIII-Settlement, Authorities transfer ring such property to claimants and petitioner never challenging such transfer-Order of High Court holding that petitioner had no locus standi to challenge transfer at this stage for he could apply and be considered only for available property-Held. cannot be taken excep tion to.-Locus standi.