Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Separation meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Separation

Separation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1948 PLD 171 PRIVY-COUNCIL Judicial Precedent

Hindu Law Joint family-Separation-Onus of proof. Where the old family firm was joint and the branch firms, having been started with a nucleus of family property, were also joint, it was the task of the plaintiffs and their allies to prove a separation.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Separation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124946556

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Separation"

PLC 1996
Appeal No. HYD-6 of 1992, decided on 24th September, 1995.

1996 PLC 61

SINDH ABADGAR'S SUGAR MILLS LTD., DINPUR DISTRICT HYDERABAD Versus MUHAMMAD ARAB

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh
CLC 1984
Suit No.229 of 1982, heard on 11th March,1984.

1984 C L C 2705

AVA A. COWASJEE and 8 others‑‑Plaintiffs Versus NASREE, NI SHAH and 4 others‑‑Defendants

Court: Karachi
PTD 2000
Miscellaneous Civil Case No. 374 of 1993, decided on 9th July, 1996.

2000 P T D 696

K. N. OIL INDUSTRIES Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: 232 I T R 479
CLC 1988
R.O.R. No.231 of 1987, decided on 30tt. August, 1988.

1988 C L C 2443

Mst. NOORAN‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. SUBAN and others‑‑Respondents

Court: Punjab
PLD 1986
High Court Appeal No. 56 and Civil Miscellaneous Applications 430 and 431 of 1986, decided on 8th April, 1986.

P L D 1986 Karachi 446

ASIF ANWAR AND ANOTHER‑Appellants Versus MESSRS NISHIBE KAIKE MANUFACTURING COMPANY LTD. AND ANOTHER‑ Respondents

Court:
YLR 2020
Criminal Appeals Nos.359-P, 368-P and Writ Petition No. 2414-P of 2015, decided on 11th March, 2020.

2020 Y L R 1917

STATE through Regional Director ANF, Peshawar and others — Appellants Versus JAMSHED and others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
PCRLJ 1986
Criminal Revision No. 6 of 1946, decided on 22nd July, 1986.

1986 P Cr

THE STATE — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AZIZ and 2 other — Respondents

Court: Shariat Court (AJ & K)
PLD 2003
2003-February-25

P L D 2003 Supreme Court 891

STATE through Deputy Prosecutor-General, Camp Office, Karachi — Petitioner Versus RAMESH M. UDESHI, EX-SECRETARY, BOARD OF REVENUE (LAND UTILIZATION), SINDH and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1950
Regular Second Appeal No. 487 of 1944, decided on 17th November 1949, from the order of the District Judge of Zillah" Sylhet, dated 28th March 1944.

P L D 1950 Dacca 13

Defendants‑Appellants Versus ABDUL AZIZ KKAN and others Respondents

Court:
PLD 1952
Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 1033 of 1945, decided on 21st December 1951, against the decree of Satya Gopal Mookherjee, Subordinate Judge of Zilla Rajshahi, to Rent Appeal No. 21 of 1944, dated the 5th January 1945, affirming the decree of Umadas Gupta, Munsif Sadar, Rajshahi, dated the 20th March 1944.

P L D 1952 Dacca 461

SASIKAMAL MAITRA and another‑Appellants Versus MOHANTA BHAGABAN DAS and others‑Respondents

Court:

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library