Home Maxims & Terms Mandatory provision meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Mandatory provision

Mandatory provision legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2024 CLD 230 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Mandatory provisionScope

Whenever intent of a statute is mandatory, it is clothed with a negative command.

2024 PLD 53 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Mandatory provisionScope

Whenever intent of a statute is mandatory, it is clothed with a negative command.

2023 PLD 81 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 6Written statementDelay in filing written statementMandatory provisionScope

Section 6 of the Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act, 2012, provides a period of 30 days to a defendant for filing the written statement which starts from the date of first appearance of defendant before the Court

Under subsection (2) of S. 6, penalty has been provided if the written statement is not filed within the stipulated time and in case of such default, the Court "shall" strike off the defence of the defendant as a consequence of which he shall also not be allowed to lead his evidence.

2023 PLD 81 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 6Written statementDelay in filing written statementMandatory provisionScope

Use of word "shall" in S. 6 gives a clear indication that the provision is mandatory in nature and has to be adhered to by the courts in letter and spirit and no exception can be created.

2023 PLD 536 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Mandatory provisionDetermining factor

Provision of any law can only be termed as mandatory when on account of its non-compliance some penal consequences are also provided

In absence of any penal consequences generally such provision can be treated as directory.

2022 CLD 251 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Mandatory provisions

When a statute would create rights/ obligation and prescribed the mode of its enjoyment of enforcement, such provision was considered mandatory and that the Legislature intended compliance of such provision to be essential to the validity of the act/proceedings.

2022 MLD 584 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
R.6Report of result of test or analysisMandatory provisionScope

Rule 6 of Control of Narcotic Substances (Government Analysts) Rules, 2001, is mandatory, its non-observance shall invalidate the result.

2020 PLD 306 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Mandatory provisionPrecondition

When a provision of law is couched with penal consequences, then such a provision is considered as mandatory.

2017 CLCN 131 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Mandatory provisionInterpretationEssentialsMere use of word "shall" in a provision would not make the same mandatory in all eventualities

Unless some consequences of non-compliance of the provision were provided in the statute, the same could not be termed as mandatory despite use of word "shall" in the same

Even the words "may" and "shall" were also interchangeable.

2017 YLR 557 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
R. 61(b)Election petitionAll the contesting candidates were made partyService of copy of petitionMandatory provisionViolationScopePetitioner had made all the contesting candidates as party in the petition

No document i.e postal receipt and courier service receipt had been produced to substantiate that petitioner had sent copy of election petition to all the contesting candidates before filing petition

Requirement of law having not been fulfilled, election petition was rightly dismissed in circumstances.

2014 CLD 1367 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Mandatory provisionEffect

Mandatory provisions of a statute are required to be complied strictly and no deviation of whatsoever nature is acceptable unless otherwise required by law

Compliance of mandatory provision of law is more important than wisdom of individual which negates such compliance.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Mandatory provision", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124946724

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Mandatory provision"

PCRLJ 1996
N/A

1996 P Cr

MUHAMMAD NASIR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Peshawar
MLD 2004
Cr. Appeals Nos.321 and 322 of 1996, decided on 1st June, 1998.

2004 M L D 1468

GHULAM MUSTAFA‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 1995
23rd April 1995

1995 P Cr

Syed ABDUL RASOOL SHAH — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 1989
Criminal Appeal No.90 of 1988/BWP, decided on 17th December, 1988.

1989 P Cr

WAHID BAKHSH RANA — Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLC 1997
Revision Application No. SUK‑66 of 1996, decided on 24th April, 1996.

1997 P L C 153

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TUBEWELL DIVISION SCARP, NAUSHERO FEROZE Versus MUHAMMAD RAFIQ and 161 others

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh
PLC(CS) 1992
Appeal No. 17 of 1991, decided on 2nd June, 1991.

1992 P L C (C

ALI AKBAR Versus D.I.-G. P., COMMANDANT, SINDH RESERVE POLICE, KARACHI and another

Court: Service Tribunal Sindh
PCRLJ 2008
2007-October-9

2008 P Cr

THE STATE — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD RASHEED and another — Respondents

Court: Shariat Court (AJ&K)
PCRLJ 1986
Criminal Appeal No. 551 of 1985, decided on 17th November, 1985.

1986 P C r

SABIR RAZA NADEEM Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PTD 2000
Files Nos. 1 to 3, 5, 7, 8 and 10/Income-tax Appeal, decided on 19th May, 2000.

2000 P T D 2872

Through Inam Elahi Azhar, EVP and Provincial Chief, PHQ (Punjab) Versus INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AJK COUNCIL, MUZAFFARABAD

Court: Azad J & K High Court
CLC 2006
2005-August-20

2006 C L C 1552

COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION, SKARDU and 2 others — Appellants Versus Mst. KHATIJA BEGUM — Respondent

Court: Northern Areas Chief Court