Insufficiently stamped
Insufficiently stamped legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Insufficiently stamped Promissory Note was neither invalid nor a void instrument, but it was only subject to disabilities mentioned in S. 35 of the Stamp Act, 1881
Deficiently stamped pro note was not admissible in evidence nor it could be acted upon unless duly stamped
However in terms of S. 36 of Stamp Act, 1881 if a deficiently stamped instrument was once admitted in evidence and marked as an exhibit, it was not permissible for the Court of first instance, or in appeal or in revision to exclude such instrument from its consideration
Provisions of S. 36 of Stamp Act, 1881 were mandatory in nature and had overriding effect on S. 35 of the said Act imposing a complete bar to question the admissibility of a Promissory Note once it had been admitted and exhibited in evidence without any objection from the other side and included all such instruments which fell under proviso (a) to S.35 of the Stamp Act, 1881.
Insufficiently stamped Promissory Note was neither invalid nor a void instrument, but it was only subject to disabilities mentioned in S. 35 of the Stamp Act, 1881
Deficiently stamped pro note was not admissible in evidence nor it could be acted upon unless duly stamped
However in terms of S. 36 of Stamp Act, 1881 if a deficiently stamped instrument was once admitted in evidence and marked as an exhibit, it was not permissible for the Court of first instance, or in appeal or in revision to exclude such instrument from its consideration
Provisions of S. 36 of Stamp Act, 1881 were mandatory in nature and had overriding effect on S. 35 of the said Act imposing a complete bar to question the admissibility of a Promissory Note once it had been admitted and exhibited in evidence without any objection from the other side and included all such instruments which fell under proviso (a) to S.35 of the Stamp Act, 1881.
"Insufficiently stamped", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124946765
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Insufficiently stamped"
2014 C L D 1378
Sheikh MUHAMMAD SHAKEEL — Appellant Versus Sheikh Hafiz MUHAMMAD ASLAM — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2014 S C M R 1562
Sheikh MUHAMMAD SHAKEEL — Appellant Versus Sheikh Hafiz MUHAMMAD ASLAM — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1982 Lahore 305
Master GHULAM RASUL‑Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE AND ANOTHER Respondents
Court:P L D 1981 Lahore 286
Master GHULAM RASUL‑Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE AND ANOTHER — Respondents
Court: 5. 12‑Court‑fee‑Court trying suit or hearing an appeal has jurisdiction to determine amount of fee chargeable on plaint or memo randum of appeal‑Objection with regard to insufficiency of court fee‑To be taken up at earliest possible moment‑Plaint or appeal' admitted to regular hearing in spite of deficiency in payment of court-fee‑Not to be. dismissed in haste.‑Plaint‑Appeal (civil).P L D 1984 Peshawar 2
Mian SHER REHMAN‑Petitioner. Versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF KHAN AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court:P L D 2011 Lahore 149
MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE and another — Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL and another — Respondents
Court: High Court1994 C L C 1465
MUHAMMAD AFZAL‑‑‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM‑‑‑Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 1966 Azad J & K 51
SOHBAT ALI AND OTHERS‑Appellants Versus FAQAR DIN‑Respondent
Court:1983 C L C 109
Malik MUHAMMAD WARYAM‑Appellant Versus Mst. SHAHNAZ MASOOD‑Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 1970 Supreme Court 37
MUHAMMAD NAWAZ KHAN AND ANOTHER‑ — Petitioners Versus MAKHDOOM SYED GHULAM MUJTABA SHAH AND ANOTHER‑ — Respondents
Court: