Home Maxims & Terms Benefit obtained by agent meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Benefit obtained by agent

Benefit obtained by agent legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 SCMR 1702 SUPREME-COURT-OF-UK Judicial Precedent
Breach of fiduciary duty by agentBenefit obtained by agentAgent making secret benefit/profit in breach of his fiduciary dutyRemedy for principalProprietary remedyEquitable compensation

Where an agent received a benefit in breach of his fiduciary duty, he was obliged to account to the principal for such a benefit, and to pay, in effect, a sum equal to profit by way of equitable compensation

Principal's right to seek an account undoubtedly gave him a right in equitable compensation in respect of the bribe or secret commission, which equaled the quantum of that bribe or commission (subject to any permissible deduction in favour of the agent - e.g. for expenses incurred)

Where an agent acquired a benefit which came to his notice as a result of his fiduciary position, or pursuant to an opportunity which resulted from his fiduciary position, the general equitable rule was that he was to be treated as having acquired the benefit on behalf of his principal, so it was beneficially owned by the principal

In such cases, the principal had a proprietary remedy in addition to his personal remedy against the agent, and the principal could elect between the two remedies.

2014 SCMR 1702 SUPREME-COURT-OF-UK Judicial Precedent
Breach of fiduciary duty by agentBenefit obtained by agentAgent making secret commission/profit/bribe in breach of his fiduciary dutyRemedy for principalProprietary and personal remedyCommission/bribe/profit held on trust for principal

Whether in respect of secret profit/bribe/commission received by agent, the principal only had a claim for equitable compensation or also had a proprietary interest in the same

Deal for purchase of property

Agent acting on behalf of principal in respect of purchase of property from vendor - Agent obtaining undisclosed/secret commission from vendor without knowledge of principal

Agent held such secret commission or bribe on trust for his principal, and the principal had a proprietary claim to it

Bribes and secret commissions received by an agent should be treated as the property of his principal, rather than merely giving rise to a claim for equitable compensation

Secret commissions inevitably tended to undermine trust in the commercial world

Proceeds of a bribe or secret commission consisted of property which should not be in the agent's estate at all

In many cases, the bribe or commission would very often have reduced the benefit from the relevant transaction which the principal would have obtained, and therefore it could fairly be said to be the principal's property

Principal whose agent had obtained a bribe or secret commission should be able to trace the proceeds of the bribe or commission into other assets and to follow them into the hands of knowing recipients.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Benefit obtained by agent", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124946909

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Benefit obtained by agent"

SCMR 2014
Decided on 16th July, 2014.

2014 S C M R 1702

CEDAR CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC — Appellant Versus FHR EUROPEAN VENTURES LLP and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of UK*
CLC 2007
2006-September-26

2007 C L C 1290

KISHWAR IQBAL KHAN — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD ALI ZAKI KHAN and others — Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 1983
Civil Appeal No. 100 of 1982, decided on 19th June, 1983.

P L D 1983 Supreme Court 421

STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION-Appellant Versus Mst... BEGUM JAN-Respondent

Court:
PLD 1978
Income‑tax Reference No. 16 of 1970, decided on 3rd May 1978.

P L D 1978 Karachi 768

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX‑Petitioner Versus MESSRS EXCIDE BATTERIES OF PAKISTAN LTD.‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1966
Civil Petitions for Special Leave to Appeals Nos. 62‑D to 70‑D of 1966, decided on 19th May 1966.

P L D 1966 Supreme Court 762

EBADUR RAHMAN AND OTHSRS‑Petitioners Versus (1) THE COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CHITTAGONG, AND

Court: (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Art. 98(4)‑Interim order in writ petition‑Court should be satisfied before granting stay that impugned order was "clearly in violation of something having the force of law"‑Case of renewal of licence of Clearing Agents under new Customs House Agents (Licensing) Rules, 1965.
CLC 1988
Election Petition No.. F17(78)/85‑Elec(II), decided on 17th September, 1987.

1988 C L C 750

Mian SHAH JEH A N‑‑Petitioner Versus ABDUS SUBHAN KHAN and others‑‑Respondents

Court: Election Tribunal N.‑W.F.P.
SCMR 1997
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.219‑P of 1996, decided on 5th June, 1997.

1997SCMR 1811

Haji FAQIR MUHAMMAD and others ‑‑‑Petitioners Versus PIR MUHAMMAD and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 1980
I. T. A. No. 428/(Pb.) of 1978‑79, decided on 31st May, 1980.

1980 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income‑tax Appellate Tribunal
CLD 2013
2012-February-23

2013 C L D 1718

SHEHZADA AKHTAR — Appellant Versus BANK ALFALAH LTD. and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2013
2012-February-23

P L D 2013 Lahore 448

SHEHZADA AKHTAR — Appellant Versus BANK AL-FLAH LTD. and others — Respondents

Court: High Court