Equitable compensation
Equitable compensation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Where an agent received a benefit in breach of his fiduciary duty, he was obliged to account to the principal for such a benefit, and to pay, in effect, a sum equal to profit by way of equitable compensation
Principal's right to seek an account undoubtedly gave him a right in equitable compensation in respect of the bribe or secret commission, which equaled the quantum of that bribe or commission (subject to any permissible deduction in favour of the agent - e.g. for expenses incurred)
Where an agent acquired a benefit which came to his notice as a result of his fiduciary position, or pursuant to an opportunity which resulted from his fiduciary position, the general equitable rule was that he was to be treated as having acquired the benefit on behalf of his principal, so it was beneficially owned by the principal
In such cases, the principal had a proprietary remedy in addition to his personal remedy against the agent, and the principal could elect between the two remedies.
"Equitable compensation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124946911
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Equitable compensation"
2015 S C M R 177
AIB GROUP (UK) PLC — Appellant Versus MARK REDLER & CO. SOLICITORS — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of UK*2015 C L C 676
Mst. MEHR AFZOON — Appellant Versus T.M.A. — Respondent
Court: Peshawar2014 S C M R 1702
CEDAR CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC — Appellant Versus FHR EUROPEAN VENTURES LLP and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of UK*2025 S C M R 1764
RUKHADZE and others — Appellants Versus RECOVERY PARTNERS GP LTD and another — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of UK*P L D 1953 Peshawar 65
GHULAM HAQANI AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus Mst. ZULEKHA AND OTHERS‑Plaintiff‑Respondents
Court:2016 C L C 1850
PAKISTAN STATE OIL COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. — Petitioner Versus ZULEKHA KHANUM and 6 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh2010 P T D (Trib
N/A
Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal PakistanP L D 1949 Privy Council 334
Present: Lord Simonds, Lord Radcliffe and Sir Lionel Leach SURENDRA NATH SARKAR and others-Appellants Versus Sree Sree ISWAR LAKSHMI DURGA and others-Respondents
Court:1984 C L C 2830
MUHAMMAD YOUNUS KHAN 3 others‑‑Plaintiffs Versus KARACHI ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION and another‑‑Defendents
Court: Karachi2011 C L C 1342
LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, and another — Appellants Versus Mst. IQBAL BEGUM through Legal heirs — Respondent
Court: Lahore