Home Maxims & Terms Equitable compensation meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Equitable compensation

Equitable compensation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 SCMR 1702 SUPREME-COURT-OF-UK Judicial Precedent
Breach of fiduciary duty by agentBenefit obtained by agentAgent making secret benefit/profit in breach of his fiduciary dutyRemedy for principalProprietary remedyEquitable compensation

Where an agent received a benefit in breach of his fiduciary duty, he was obliged to account to the principal for such a benefit, and to pay, in effect, a sum equal to profit by way of equitable compensation

Principal's right to seek an account undoubtedly gave him a right in equitable compensation in respect of the bribe or secret commission, which equaled the quantum of that bribe or commission (subject to any permissible deduction in favour of the agent - e.g. for expenses incurred)

Where an agent acquired a benefit which came to his notice as a result of his fiduciary position, or pursuant to an opportunity which resulted from his fiduciary position, the general equitable rule was that he was to be treated as having acquired the benefit on behalf of his principal, so it was beneficially owned by the principal

In such cases, the principal had a proprietary remedy in addition to his personal remedy against the agent, and the principal could elect between the two remedies.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Equitable compensation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124946911

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Equitable compensation"

SCMR 2015
Decided on 5th November, 2014.

2015 S C M R 177

AIB GROUP (UK) PLC — Appellant Versus MARK REDLER & CO. SOLICITORS — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of UK*
CLC 2015
2013-December-20

2015 C L C 676

Mst. MEHR AFZOON — Appellant Versus T.M.A. — Respondent

Court: Peshawar
SCMR 2014
Decided on 16th July, 2014.

2014 S C M R 1702

CEDAR CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC — Appellant Versus FHR EUROPEAN VENTURES LLP and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of UK*
SCMR 2025
Decided on 19th March, 2025.

2025 S C M R 1764

RUKHADZE and others — Appellants Versus RECOVERY PARTNERS GP LTD and another — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of UK*
PLD 1953
Revision Petition No. 97 of 1952, decided on 18th June 1953, against the order and decree of Abdullah Jan, Senior Sub‑Judge, Mardan dated 19th March 1952, whereby the appeal of the defendants‑petitioners against the order and decree of Allah Nawaz Khan, Sub‑Judge, 4th Class, Mardan dated 28ih January 1952 was dismissed.

P L D 1953 Peshawar 65

GHULAM HAQANI AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus Mst. ZULEKHA AND OTHERS‑Plaintiff‑Respondents

Court:
CLC 2016
2016-June-15

2016 C L C 1850

PAKISTAN STATE OIL COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. — Petitioner Versus ZULEKHA KHANUM and 6 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
PTD 2010
I.T.A. No. 704-KB of 2009, decided on 15th December, 2009.

2010 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PLD 1949
Privy Council Appeal No. 39 of 1946, decided on 6th Decem ber, 1949. from Calcutta.

P L D 1949 Privy Council 334

Present: Lord Simonds, Lord Radcliffe and Sir Lionel Leach SURENDRA NATH SARKAR and others-Appellants Versus Sree Sree ISWAR LAKSHMI DURGA and others-Respondents

Court:
CLC 1984
Suit No.348 of 1981, decided on 15th March, 1984.

1984 C L C 2830

MUHAMMAD YOUNUS KHAN 3 others‑‑Plaintiffs Versus KARACHI ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION and another‑‑Defendents

Court: Karachi
CLC 2011
2010-December-13

2011 C L C 1342

LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, and another — Appellants Versus Mst. IQBAL BEGUM through Legal heirs — Respondent

Court: Lahore