Commercial insolvency
Commercial insolvency legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
In the event of failure to pay debt in accordance with statutory notice of demand under S.306 of Companies Ordinance, 1984, insolvency was to be presumed through it could also be proved in other ways.
Company had become "commercially insolvent" and was unable to pay its debts and its paid up capital had been completely wiped out
Even the remotest possibility of revival of the company did not exist and its further existence or continuance would only multiply its liabilities to detriment of its creditors and shareholders
Effect
Winding-up of the company had become inevitable and no objection was received from any quarter and statutory presumption as to commercial insolvency of the company was created
High Court appointed official assignee as Official Liquidator, who would take over complete charge and control of the affairs and assets of the company
High Court directed that official liquidator would perform all such duties and functions and exercise all such powers as were required under the law
Mills of the company were located in different districts in other province, therefore, official liquidator was authorized to seek assistance of such persons at those places as he might deem fit and proper in the best interest of creditors and shareholders and for expeditious winding-up of the company
Petition was allowed in circumstances.
"Commercial insolvency", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124947023
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Commercial insolvency"
P L D 1990 Supreme Court 763
Messrs ALI WOOLLEN MILLS Ltd.‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF‑PAKISTAN and 3 others ‑‑‑Respondents
Court:2008 C L D 214
HUMERA ABDUL AZIZ ESSA — .Petitioner Versus AL-ABBAS CEMENT INDUSTRIES LIMITED — Respondent
Court: Karachi2014 C L D 1482
UNITED BANK LIMITED — Petitioner Versus GULISTAN TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED — Respondents
Court: Sindh2001 Y L R 838
MANHATTAN COMMUNICATION (PVT.) LTD. — Petitioner Versus GHANDHARA NISSAN LIMITED — Respondent
Court: KarachiP L D 1998 Karachi 330
UNITED BANK LIMITED — Petitioner Versus GOLDEN TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED — Respondent
Court: High Court1991 M L D 124
Messrs HABIB BANK LTD: — Petitioner Versus Messrs GOLDEN PLASTIC (PVT.) LTD: — Respondent
Court: Karachi2002 C L D 746
Messrs PAK SHAHEEN (PVT.) LTD. ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ORDINANCE 1984 through Agent Messrs Pak Shaheen (Pvt.) Ltd.
Court: Lahore1993 C L C 1540
Messrs INDUSTRIAL. DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Messrs SARELA CEMENT LIMITED COMPANY‑‑‑Respondent
Court: QuettaP L D 1997 Karachi 416
and 5 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Messrs BALOCHISTAN COATERS LTD. ‑‑‑Respondent
Court:2006 C L D 227
FAYSAL BANK LIMITED through Attorney — Petitioner Versus IRAM GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. Through Chief Executive -Respondent
Court: Lahore