Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Preference of litigant meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Preference of litigant

Preference of litigant legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 PTD 2014 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
BenchPreference of litigant

None of the parties to a judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings could claim hearing by a Bench of his choice.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Preference of litigant", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124947034

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Preference of litigant"

PTD 2014
Writ Petition No.2478 of 2013, decided on 20th December, 2013.

2014 P T D 2014

COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, ISLAMABAD Versus CHAIRMAN, CUSTOMS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL and 6 others

Court: Islamabad High Court
CLC 2010
2010-January-13

2010 C L C 532

ANWAR-UD-DIN — Petitioner Versus FAHMIDA AKHTAR and 8 others — Respondents

Court: Karachi
CLC 2023
2022-September-8

2023 C L C 1098

ABDUL REHMAN — Plaintiff Versus NOMAN ABID and another — Defendants

Court: Sindh
MLD 2015
2014-September-8

2015 M L D 701

MUMTAZ ALI and 3 others — Applicants Versus IQBAL AHMED through L.Rs. and 11 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
CLC 2020
2019-March-13

2020 C L C 1068

ASMA HASSAN and another — Petitioners Versus ASKARI BANK LIMITED — Respondent

Court: Sindh
PLD 2020
2019-December-6

P L D 2020 Sindh 717

Mst. NAGHMA IMRAN — Applicant Versus The STATE and 6 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 1993
Writ Petition No. 9765 of 1992, decided on 17th October, 1992.

1993 C L C 696

MUHAMMAD SAFDAR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FAUJI FERTILIZER and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLR 2020
----S. 13---Punjab Consolidation of Holdings Rules, 1998, R. 52---Confirmed consolidation scheme--- Review of---Second review petition was moved before Member Board of Revenue who quashed the confirmed consolidation scheme---Validity---Board of Revenue was vested with jurisdiction, whether invoked by an aggrieved person through a petition or suo motu, to go into the consolidation proceedings/scheme for its affirmation or otherwise---Consolidation scheme itself could not be abrogated without taking the action provided under R. 52 of Punjab Consolidation of Holdings Rules, 1998---Petitioners in earlier round of litigation had lost upto the level of Board of Revenue on judicial side---Member, Board of Revenue had ignored the said order, which had merged into the orders passed by the High Court when constitutional petitions were dismissed---Consolidation scheme had been implemented not only in the record but also on the spot---When earlier order passed by the predecessor of Member Board of Revenue had attained finality then de novo proceedings could not be initiated by the landlords---Consolidation scheme had been confirmed which could not be quashed, in circumstances---Second review petition was not competent when earlier one had been judicially culminated---Once a matter had been decided on judicial side then exercise of executive or judicial authority thereafter to nullify the effect of earlier judicial decision was improper---Impugned order passed by the Member Board of Revenue being void ab initio and nullity in the eye of law was set aside---Constitutional petition was allowed, in circumstances.

2020 Y L R 1232

SARFRAZ and 2 others — Petitioners Versus SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE and 209 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLC 1997
Revision Petition No. SL‑220 of 1996, decided on 30th June, 1996.

1997 P L C 216

MUHAMMAD KHALIL Versus PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION through District Manager, Sahiwal

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab
PLC 1996
Appeal No.213 of 1993, decided on 14th March, 1996.

1996 P L C 571

MAHMOOD-UR-REHMAN Versus THE PRESIDENT, NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN, KARACHI and another

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library