Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Independent entity meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Independent entity

Independent entity legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 PTD 1861 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss. 3 & 8Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA)Independent entity

Although WAPDA's affairs to some extent were controlled by the Government but for all practical purposes it was an independent entity authorized to carry out the business of utilization of water and power resources of the country and to generate electricity.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Independent entity", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124947037

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Independent entity"

PTD 2000
I.T.C. No. 54 of 1996, decided on 4th December, 1996.

2000 P T D 1767

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus OSWAL ENTERPRISES (P.) LTD.

Court: 234 I T R 483
SCMR 1981
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 263 of 1977, decided on 10th August. 1981.

1981 S C M R 1176

ASHIQ HUSSAIN-Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER ETC.-Respondents

Court: High Court
PLC(CS) 1989
Appeal No. 39/781 of 1986, decided on 30th September, 1987.

1989 P L C (C

Mian RIAZ AHMAD Versus ALI ASGHAR, A.S.-I. and another

Court: Service Tribunal Punjab
CLC 1985
Regular Second Appeal No. 752 of 1977, heard on 20th January, 1985.

1985CLC1926

Syed IJAZ HUSSAIN — Appellant Versus MUNIR AHMAD and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 1999
Civil Appeal No.74 of 1997, decided on 25th May, 1998.

1999 M L D 1270

FAIZ AHMAD — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE-and another — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
PLD 2022
2021-December-7

P L D 2022 Peshawar 118

REVEREND JIMMY MATHEW — Petitioners Versus BISHOP PETERS and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PTD 2004
I.T.A. No.264/KB of 2003, decided on 3rd April, 2004.

2004 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income‑tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PLC(CS) 2008
C.P. No.D-1972 of 2006, decided on 4th February, 2008.

2008 P L C (C

AIJAZ AHMED Versus STATE CEMENT CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. and others

Court: Karachi High Court
CLC 1990
merits in preference to ex parte orders and that if these be merits on the side of the applicant, in a case dismissed for default in appearance and hardship was shown that might also be a relevant circumstance for condonation of default in appearance.‑‑[Practice and procedure]

1990CLC110

MUHAMMAD SULEMAN‑‑Applicant Versus WILAYATULLAH KHAN and 2 others‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PTD 2001
Income‑tax Applications Nos.282 to 286 of 1998, decided on 13th April, 1999.

2001 P T D 380

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX Versus D.K. TRADING CO.

Court: 238 I T R 887

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library