Home Maxims & Terms Disjunctive meaning meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Disjunctive meaning

Disjunctive meaning legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 PTD 2016 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words in a statuteDisjunctive meaningScopeCourts could assign disjunctive meaning to particular words in a statute

Such construction was permissible if it reflected the true intention of the Legislature and if to hold otherwise would render particular words in the statute either meaningless or lead to absurdity.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Disjunctive meaning", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124947039

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Disjunctive meaning"

MLD 2008
2005-July-5

2008 M L D 868

TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION; MANDI BHAUDDIN — Appellant Versus EVACUEE TRUST PROPERTY BOARD and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PTD 2019
I.T.R.A. No. 46 of 2014, decided on 14th June, 2016.*

2019 P T D 1187

HUB POWER CO. LIMITED Versus COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ISLAMABAD

Court: Islamabad High Court
PTD 2014
Civil Appeals Nos. 1540 - 1599 of 2013 and Civil Appeal No.21 of 2014, decided on 22nd August, 2014.

2014 P T D 2016

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary M/o Petroleum and Natural Resources and another Versus DURRANI CERAMICS and others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2014
Civil Appeals Nos. 1540 - 1599 of 2013 and Civil Appeal No.21 of 2014, decided on 22nd August, 2014.

2014 S C M R 1630

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary M/o Petroleum and Natural Resources and another — Appellants Versus DURRANI CERAMICS and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2011
2010-October-21

P L D 2011 Karachi 41

Engr. K.M. ASGHAR — Petitioner Versus PROVINCIAL CHIEF, HBFS, KARACHI and 2 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLD 2006
N/A

2006 C L D 371

FIRST CAPITAL SECURITIES CORPORATION LTD. — Appellant Versus COMMISSIONER (SECURITIES MARKET) SEC, ISLAMABAD — Respondent

Court: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan
CLC 2002
Writ Petition No. 187 of 19.95, decided on 18th September, 2001.

2002 C L C 54

Master SAID‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Ch. IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN, DISTRICT JUDGE, JHANG and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLC(CS) 2005
F.A.O. No. 153 of 2002, decided on 1st July, 2004.

2005 P L C (C

Dr. ANJUM SYED Versus FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION through Chairman, Islamabad and 3 others

Court: Lahore High Court
PLC(CS) 2007
F.A.O. No.153 of 2002, decided on 15sth June, 2006.

2007 P L C (C

Dr. ANJUM SYED Versus FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION through Chairman, Islamabad and 3 others

Court: Lahore High Court
PLC(CS) 2013
Writ Petition No.19417 of 2011, decided on 9th April, 2012.

2013 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD MUNAWAR JANG SHER QADRI, Advocate Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Chief Secretary, Lahore and 3 others

Court: Lahore High Court