Failure to record evidence
Failure to record evidence legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Role alleged against accused by women witnesses was restricted to his mere presence at the spot without actively participating in the incident
Even the role alleged in F.I.R. against accused was not supported by any other material available on record
During investigation statements under S.161, Cr.P.C., of women witnesses was not recorded to establish, prima facie, allegations levelled against accused in F.I.R.
Effect
Two F.I.Rs. of same incident with variation was registered at same police station by different complainants which after due investigation were found to be having sufficient material against accused to refer them for trial
Such investigations had made the case against accused to be of further inquiry into his guilt in terms of S. 497(2), Cr.P.C.
Accused was arrested during investigation but no recovery of any incriminating article was effected from him to support prosecution story as narrated in F.I.R. that at the time of alleged incident the accused was armed with weapon
Bail was allowed in circumstances.
"Failure to record evidence", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124952822
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Failure to record evidence"
1984 P L C 1695
MESSRS KAKAKHEL INDUSTRIES Versus Mst. MUNIRAN BIBI
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab1984 P L C 589
ALI MUHAMMAD Versus OCCUPIER OF ADAMS TEA BLENDING FACTORY, LYARI
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal SindP L D 1952 Baluchistan 56
Mst. BADR‑UN‑NISA‑Surety‑Petitioner Versus CROWN‑Respondent
Court: High Court1982 C L C 2377
HASHMAIL ALI‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ALI ETC. ‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1985 C L C 1122
NAZIR DAD KHAN-Appellants Versus QAMAR AFTAB and 4 others-Respondents
Court: Azad J & K2015 P Cr
MUHAMMAD KHAN alias MUHAMMAD BUX — Applicant Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: Sindh2003 C L D 789
MUHAMMAD ANWAR KHAN — Appellant Versus HABIB BANK LTD. and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2005 C L D 1511
NASIR MUSHTAQ SHEIKH — Appellant Versus PLATINIUM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. through General Attorney and 6 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1982 C L C 1573
GHULAM FATIMA ETC.‑Appellants Versus Syed BASHIR AHMAD‑Respondent
Court: Lahore2020 C L C 785
Mrs. AFROZ SHAH and another — Appellants Versus ADVOCATE GENERAL SINDH and 11 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh