Disposal of appeal on merits only
Disposal of appeal on merits only legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Sessions Court (First Appellate Court) disposed of appeal filed by accused against his conviction and sentence for the reason that it had become infructuous as accused had already served out the sentence awarded to him by the Trial Court
Legality
Even after an accused had served out his sentence, appeal could not be disposed of on such ground, and same should have been proceeded and decided on merits
Impugned order of Sessions Court was set aside and case was remanded to the Sessions Court to be decided afresh on merits in accordance with law
Application was disposed of accordingly.
"Disposal of appeal on merits only", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124952825
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Disposal of appeal on merits only"
2015 P Cr
SIRAJ — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: Sindh1993 S C M R 226
FAZAL ELAHI MALIS through Legal Heirs‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Miss ABIDA REASAT RIZVI‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1993 S C M R 65
KHAN MUHAMMAD and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1987 S C M R 721
QARYAM‑‑Petitioner Versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE and others‑‑Respondents
Court: High Court2024 Y L R 2568
Muhammad Saqlain — Petitioner Versus The State through Advocate General Punjab and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore1982 S C M R 748
SARDAR ALI SHAHEEN-Petitioner Versus DISTRICTC MAGISTRTE AND OTHERS — Respondents
Court: Foodstuffs Distribution Order, 1978 M. L. A. Zone 'A'-1985 S C M R 464
ABDUL GHAFOOR‑‑Appellant Versus CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER and another‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑Art. 199‑‑Res judicata, principles of‑‑Essential ingredients‑-Principles of res judicata applicable to writ jurisdiction‑‑Matter which though was in issue but was not heard or decided either actually or constructively, could not be res judicata for purposes of subsequent proceedings‑‑Matter on which plea of res judicata was founded must have been finally adjudicated and decided in previous proceedings, in order to furnish ground for such a plea to succeed‑‑Merits of claim of appellant which were very much in issue before Letters Patent Bench in earlier proceedings were left open and undecided‑‑No finality, held, could be attached to adjudication of merits by first Court‑‑Subsequent writ petition filed by appellant on said merits, held further, was not barred on principles of res judicata.‑‑Res judicata.1985 M L D 1140
Malik PIRAN DITTA and others — Petitioners Versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD — Respondent
Court: Lahore1994 S C M R 277
MUHAMMAD AKRAM‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1994 Peshawar 17
M.C., PESHAWAR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Messrs MALIK BEVERAGES‑‑‑Respondent
Court: