Jurisdiction of Investigating Officer
Jurisdiction of Investigating Officer legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Petitioner was complainant of F.I.R. in question and was not satisfied with investigation report submitted by Investigating Officer for the reason that some nominated accused were made prosecution witnesses
Plea raised by accused was that Trial Court had started recording evidence and such application of complainant was dismissed by Trial Court
Validity
Investigating agency had no authority to give finding of guilt or innocence regarding accused persons under the provisions of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, or Police Act, 1861, Police Order, 2002 and Rules framed thereunder
Prerogative of the Court to give finding after recording of evidence and statement of accused regarding guilt or innocence and such finding of police tantamount to debar powers of Court of law
Purpose of investigating agency was to collect evidence and not to hold any person guilty or otherwise
By converting some accused as witnesses, investigating officer did not transgress his authority
Evidence collected during investigation would be properly weighed and scrutinized by Trial Court
Complainant, if not satisfied with investigation, could file private complaint
Petition was dismissed in circumstances.
"Jurisdiction of Investigating Officer", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124952829
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Jurisdiction of Investigating Officer"
2011 Y L R 131
MUHAMMAD YOUSAF — Petitioner Versus A.S.J. and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2015 P Cr
MUHAMMAD SAEED AHMED — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Law, Islamabad Secretariat and 5 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2019 P Cr
CHAIRMAN NAB through Prosecutor-General Accountability — Appellant Versus NADEEM AHMAD and another — Respondents
Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court1999 M L D 2002
TANVIR SHAHID — Petitioner Versus THE INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2006 P Cr
IJAZ ALI — Petitioner Versus D.P.O. and others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2009 Supreme Court 102
AJMEEL KHAN — Petitioner Versus ABDUR RAHIM and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2007 P Cr
MUHAMMAD IRSHAD KHAN — Petitioner Versus CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU and 2 others — Respondents
Court: KarachiP L D 1971 Supreme Court 677
SHAHNAZ BEGUM-Appellant Versus THE HON'BLE JUDGES OF THE HIGH COURT OF SIND AND BALUCHISTAN AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Court: Meaning-High Court under cl. 22 (in case no investigation initiated) has power to direct preliminary investigation to be started even by officer ordinarily not vested with territorial jurisdiction-High Court has no power to direct transfer of investigation from one officer to another-Words "direct" and "preliminary investigation"-Connotation-Words "preliminary investigation" in cl. 22 not same thing as "investigation" contemplated under Cr. P. C. Chauhar Khan v. The State P L D 1971 Lah. 328 overruled.1999 P Cr
MUHAMMAD AFZAL — Petitioner Versus D.I.-G. POLICE, DERA GHAZI KHAN
Court: Lahore1998 S C M R 666
SHEIKHUPURA‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SHARMAN BIBI and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan