Impleading of a party in the proceedings
Impleading of a party in the proceedings legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Purpose of impleading any person in the proceedings was to effectually and completely adjudicate upon and settle all the questions involved in the same
Proceeding with regard to custody of minor would be between mother and father of minors and all questions relating to such proceedings could be effectually and completely adjudicated upon without the insertion of any other person.
"Impleading of a party in the proceedings", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124952839
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Impleading of a party in the proceedings"
2015 Y L R 489
Syed RAZA ABBAS — Petitioner Versus Mst. SANA SAEED SATTAR and 2 others — Respondents
Court: SindhP L D 2008 High Court (AJ&K) 10
MUHAMMAD YOUNUS KHAN and 11 others — Appellants Versus Kh. MUHAMMAD ISHAQ and 6 others — Respondents
Court: High Court2001 M L D 1964
SHER MUHAMMAD and 27 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD MUMTAZ‑UL‑ISLAM through Legal Heirs
Court: Lahore1982 C L C 590
Syed AHMED SAEED KIRMANI‑Petitioner Versus PUNJAB PROVINCE AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2001 C L C 1337
AAZAZ AHMAD and 15 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Mst. SHAUKAT BEGUM and 22 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1999 M L D 1193
Sardar NAZIR AHMAD KHAN — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD SHAUKAT KHAN and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court (A J&K)1998 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD ANWAR NASEEM Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, GUJRANWALA and another
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1998 S C M R 2020
MUHAMMAD ANWAR NASEEM‑‑‑‑Appellant Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, GUJRANWALA and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2024 C L D 383
Messrs JAMHEX COMPANY (PRIVATE) LIMITED and another — Applicants Versus APPELLATE BENCH REGISTRY — Respondent
Court: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan1979 S C M R 20
KHUSHI MUHAMMAD‑Petitioner Versus CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OF AUQAF, LAHORE AND 3 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: ‑ O. I, r. 10 & O. XXXIX, r. 1‑Addition of party‑Petitioner's application for being impleaded as a party before trial Court still pending‑Petitioner if succeeding in his application could contest suit in capacity of defendant before trial Court‑Grant or refusal of stay order neither affecting petitioner nor interfering with his possession due to his having a decree in his favour qua his dispossession‑Appellate Court being in a position, notwithstanding petitioner, to effectually and completely adjudicate upon and settle question in appeal, petitioner's application for being impleaded as a party in appeal before District Judge in proceeding arising out of a decision on an application under O. XXXIX r. 1, held, could not be accepted.‑ Impleading of party- Appeal (civil)‑Injunction.