Home Maxims & Terms Fundamental norm meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Fundamental norm

Fundamental norm legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2015 PLD 28 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Public officialGood characterFundamental norm

Good character qualities were a fundamental norm for any holder of public office.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Fundamental norm", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124952849

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Fundamental norm"

PLD 2015
N/A

P L D 2015 Lahore 28

RIZWAN ZAKA GILL — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB — Respondent

Court: High Court
PLD 1971
Civil Appeal No. 29 of 1970, decided on 11th November 1970.

P L D 1971 Supreme Court 192

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ-Appellant Versus Mst. GHAFURAN BIBI-Respondent

Court:
MLD 1990
1990-May-30

1990 M L D 2304

MASSU and 27 others — Petitioners Versus UNITED BANK LIMITED and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1989
Criminal Appeal No. 2 and Murder Reference No. l of 1987, decided on 14th November, 1988.

P L D 1989 Peshawar 51

ABDUL GHAFFAR and another‑ — ‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court:
PCRLJ 2022
N/A

2022 P Cr

IRFAN alias IMRAN alias KADU — Appellant Versus The STATE and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
PLD 1973
Criminal Appeals Nos. 61, 62, 63, 64 and 69 of 1972, decided on 8th January 1973. 4, (On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated the 6th July 1972, in Writ Petition No. 403 of 1972/No. 404 of 1972/No. 223 of 1972/No. 335 of 1972/No. 625 of 1972).

P L D 1973 Supreme Court 49

THE STATE‑Appellant Versus ZIA‑UR‑RAHMAN AND OTHHERS‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1989
Suit No.19 of 1986, decided on 29th March, 1989.

P L D 1989 Karachi 371

HABIB BANK LIMITED‑‑Plaintiff Versus Messrs WAHEED TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED and 5 others‑‑Defendants

Court:
PTD 1971
Writ Petition No. 2042 of 1964, decided on 1st July 1968.

1971 P T D 902

P. R. EASWARAN Versus SIXTH INCOME‑TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE II, COIMBATORE

Court: Madras (India)
PLD 2021
2020-September-30

P L D 2021 Sindh 76

PAKISTAN STATE OIL COMPANY LIMITED — Appellant Versus Messrs JAWED PERVAIZ ENTERPRISES — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1995
Writ Petition No.2233 of 1994, decided on 26th April, 1995.

P L D 1995 Karachi 409

KHURSHID ALAM and 3 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus UNITED BANK LIMITED and 7 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑‑S. 9‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑‑‑Alternate adequate remedy provided by law‑‑‑Non‑availing of‑‑‑Effect‑‑‑Constitutional petition‑‑ Competency‑‑‑Constitutional petition was not substitute of appeal or revision and being discretionary remedy could only be granted when circumstances sG warranted‑‑‑Where any condition precedent for preferring appeal had been imposed and same was not against established judicial norms, such embargo could not be deemed to be against law‑‑‑Constitutional jurisdiction 'of High Court could not be invoked when another adequate remedy was provided by law‑‑‑Banking Tribunal's decision/decree was appealable with a condition precedent of depositing decretal amount‑‑‑Petitioner did not file appeal and thus, avoided deposit of decretal amount by filing Constitutional petition‑‑ Constitutional jurisdiction could not be invoked simply to frustrate any provision of law, providing adequate remedy‑‑‑Constitutional petition was thus, not maintainable in circumstances. p. 413 A