Constitutional posts
Constitutional posts legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Plea of Federal Government that it was facing difficulties in appointments to such offices in view of the direction given by the Supreme Court in the judgment Khawoja Muhammad Asif v. Federation of Pakistan (2013 SCMR 1205), wherein it was directed that a Commission should be constituted for appointments to certain offices in statutory bodies, autonomous bodies, semi-autonomous bodies, regulatory bodies etc; that some of said offices were created by statutes providing their own procedure for appointment, and, therefore, anomalies would arise in case such appointments were made by a Commission in accordance with the directions given by the Supreme Court
Validity
Various Acts/Ordinances laid down a specific criteria/qualifications for high-level appointments and empowered the Federal Government to make such appointments
In view of Art. 90 of the Constitution it was the exclusive preserve of the Federal Government to appoint heads of , statutory bodies, autonomous bodies, semi-autonomous bodies, regulatory bodies etc. and also to make appointments on merit under the Acts/Ordinances
Appointments of heads of statutory bodies, autonomous/semi-autonomous bodies, corporations, regulatory authorities etc. were governed under specific statutory provisions which could not be overlooked or substituted by some other mechanism
In light of the observations/directions given in the judgment Khawaja Muhammad Asif v. Federation of Pakistan (2013 SCMR 1205), the legal authority for appointments had been vested in a Commission and its recommendations were made binding upon the Prime Minister, which was not in accordance with Art. 90 of the Constitution
Supreme Court while making directions for the formation of a Commission in the case Khawoja Muhammad Asif v. Federation of Pakistan (2013 SCMR 1205),overlooked provisions of Art.90 of the Constitution
Application was allowed accordingly with the observation that no statutory Commission had been created in Pakistan for examining suitability of persons for appointment to high public offices, thus the Government may consider the establishment of such a Commission through legislation in order to ensure transparency which would also enable the executive authority to make an informed decision while making appointments.
"Constitutional posts", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124952863
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Constitutional posts"
P L D 2023 Supreme Court 183
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Defense — Appellant Versus Mrs. AJMAL SAMIA (decd) through L.Rs. and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2014 Lahore 627
SAJJAD AKBER ABBASI — Petitioner Versus ADVOCATE-GENERAL PUNJAB and 3 others — Respondents
Court: High Court2000 P T D 966
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus GOVINDASWAMINATHAN
Court: 233 I T R 2642015 P L C (C
ARSHAD ALI TABASSUM Versus The REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2015 S C M R 112
ARSHAD ALI TABASSUM — Petitioner Versus The REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2025 M L D 169
Mehmood-ul-Haq — Petitioner Versus Waqas Mehmood Maan and 21 others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2015 Supreme Court 6
GHULAM RASOOL — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Establishment Division Islamabad and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2008 P L C (C
Mrs. MEHMOODA KAUSAR Versus SPECIAL SECRETARY, EDUCATION TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE and 2 others
Court: Lahore High Court2013 P Cr
BALOCHISTAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION through Chairman — Petitioner Versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU (NAB), ISLAMABAD through Chairman and 2 others — Respondents
Court: BalochistanP L D 2018 Islamabad 251
INAM-UL-RAHIEM — Petitioner Versus CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU, ISLAMABAD and another — Respondents
Court: High Court