Ownership of property
Ownership of property legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Underlying principle of law of pre-emption was that the preemptor had to own property before he could exercise such right.
"Ownership of property", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124952868
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Ownership of property"
1987 S C M R 1293
SHER AFZAL and 2 others‑‑Appellants Versus HAYAT GUL‑‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Appeal (Civil)‑‑Abatement‑‑Leave to appeal granted to appellant to consider the effect of abatement of second appeal in so far as the deceased respondent was concerned.‑‑ Appeal(civil)‑ Abatement.1976 S C M R 519
Hakeem ALLAH BAKHSH‑Petitioner Versus AHMAD DIN (THROUGH HIS HEIRS)‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑‑ S. 96(3)‑Appeal‑Consent decree‑Petitioner (defendant) making statement before Civil Judge that he had no objection to passing of decree for a given sum but he did not admit respondent (plaintiff's) ownership of property or other relationship of landlord and tenant Civil Judge, held, passed decree for given sum against petitioner on his admission and decree thus passed not a consent decree; hence appeal not barred under S. 96 (3)‑‑District Judge, held further, justified to incidentally decide question of ownership of property in dispute.‑Appeal (civil).P L D 1991 Supreme Court 727
IQBAL‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. JINAN‑‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1976 Peshawar 19
MUGHAL BAZ KHAN‑Appellant Versus SHER AFZAL KHAN‑Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 1993 Federal Shariat Court 38
MAHROZE and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT of N.‑W.F.P and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑‑Para. 650‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 203‑D‑‑‑Question of fact‑‑ Adjudication‑‑‑Jurisdiction‑‑‑Petitioner's plea, that his tribe being an old resident of the area, had throughout remained agriculturist by profession being question of fact, Federal Shariat Court, in the light of its particularly‑defined jurisdiction, had no power to decide the same.‑‑Question of fact.1995 S C M R 979
ALLAH DITTA and 2 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus DAULAT BIBI and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1981SCMR979(1)
Sh. MUHAMMAD RIAZ — Petitioner Versus Mst. NASIM AKHTAR AND OTHERS-Respondents
Court: High Court1992 P Cr
Before Raja Afrasiab Khan, J Versus Ch. ALI MUHAMMAD and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2012 Balochistan 146
Haji NIZAM UDDIN and 7 others — Petitioners Versus Haji PAYO DIN and another — Respondents
Court: High Court2009 P T D (Trib
N/A
Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan