Home Maxims & Terms Encashment of such guarantee meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Encashment of such guarantee

Encashment of such guarantee legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2015 CLD 8 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Ss. 126 & 128Contract of guaranteeBank/insurance/ performance guaranteeEncashment of such guaranteeDistinction between "conditional" and "unconditional" guaranteesIndependence and autonomy of contracts of guaranteeNature and scope

In cases of construction or service contracts, advance paid to the contractor was known as the "mobilization advance"; and normally as a pre-condition for release of the advance to the contractor, the latter was required to furnish a guarantee, either from a bank or an insurance company

Two separate and distinct agreements/contracts existed in such cases, which were firstly, the underlying agreement and secondly, the bank or insurance guarantee

On completion of the agreed work, the guarantee was to be released, or it may be enforced/encashed if a default was committed

Depending upon the intention of the parties, a bank or insurance guarantee may be either conditional or unconditional

Conditional guarantee could only be invoked on fulfilment of the condition(s) stipulated therein; for example proof of breach or default

In case of unconditional guarantee, the guarantor, that was either the bank or an insurance company, was under an obligation to honour its commitment by making payment on demand; regardless of any dispute between the parties arising out of or connected with underlying agreement/contract

"Mobilization guarantee" was an independent contact, and terms and conditions stipulated therein determined its nature and consequent effect

Like any other contract, a guarantee came into existence as a legally binding agreement between two or more willing parties, and therefore, the same had to be read and interpreted independent of any other agreement or the underlying agreement pursuant to which it had been furnished.

2015 PLD 13 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Ss. 126 & 128Contract of guaranteeBank/insurance/ performance guaranteeEncashment of such guaranteeDistinction between "conditional" and "unconditional" guaranteesIndependence and autonomy of contracts of guaranteeNature and scope

In cases of construction or service contracts, advance paid to the contractor was known as the "mobilization advance"; and normally as a pre-condition for release of the advance to the contractor, the latter was required to furnish a guarantee, either from a bank or an insurance company

Two separate and distinct agreements/contracts existed in such cases, which were firstly, the underlying agreement and secondly, the bank or insurance guarantee

On completion of the agreed work, the guarantee was to be released, or it may be enforced/encashed if a default was committed

Depending upon the intention of the parties, a bank or insurance guarantee may be either conditional or unconditional

Conditional guarantee could only be invoked on fulfilment of the condition(s) stipulated therein; for example proof of breach or default

In case of unconditional guarantee, the guarantor, that was either the bank or an insurance company, was under an obligation to honour its commitment by making payment on demand; regardless of any dispute between the parties arising out of or connected with underlying agreement/contract

"Mobilization guarantee" was an independent contact, and terms and conditions stipulated therein determined its nature and consequent effect

Like any other contract, a guarantee came into existence as a legally binding agreement between two or more willing parties, and therefore, the same had to be read and interpreted independent of any other agreement or the underlying agreement pursuant to which it had been furnished.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Encashment of such guarantee", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124952870

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Encashment of such guarantee"

CLD 2011
2011-June-13

2011 C L D 1625

Messrs CONTINENTAL CABLE (PVT.) LTD. — Plaintiff Versus Messrs CHINA HARBOR ENGINEERING CO. LTD. and another — Defendants

Court: Karachi
YLR 2011
Suit No.157 C.M.A. No.1086 of 2010, decided on 13th June, 2011.

2011 Y L R 2876

Messrs CONTINENTAL CABLE (PVT.) LTD.-Plaintiff Versus Messrs CHINA HARBOR ENGINEERING CO. LTD. and another — Defendants

Court: Karachi
CLC 2008
2008-March-3

2008 C L C 726

Messrs AYAZ BUILDERS through Attorney — Plaintiff Versus BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE KARACHI PORT TRUST and another — Defendants

Court: Karachi
CLC 1999
Constitutional Petition No.D‑2171 of 1994, decided on 28th October, 1998

1999 C L C 755

QUETTA TEXTILE MILLS LTD. ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
MLD 2013
2012-December-10

2013 M L D 1499

Messrs CRESCENT STEEL AND ALLIED PRODUCTS LIMITED — Plaintiff Versus Messrs SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINE LIMITED and another — Defendants

Court: Sindh
CLD 2013
2012-December-10

2013 C L D 1110

Messrs CRESCENT STEEL AND ALLIED PRODUCTS LIMITED — Plaintiff Versus Messrs SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINE LIMITED and another — Respondents

Court: Sindh
CLD 2015
2014-December-10

2015 C L D 8

MONTAGE DESIGN BUILD through Partner — Appellant Versus The REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN through the Embassy of Tajikistan and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Islamabad
PLD 2015
2014-December-10

P L D 2015 Islamabad 13

MONTAGE DESIGN BUILD through Partner — Appellant Versus The REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN through the Embassy of Tajikistan and 2 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLD 2021
2020-December-10

2021 C L D 518

PAKISTAN REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY (PVT.) LIMITED — Petitioner Versus Messrs SKY BLUE BUILDERS and another — Respondents

Court: Islamabad
CLC 2021
2020-December-10

2021 C L C 488

PAKISTAN REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY (PVT.) LIMITED — Petitioner Versus Messrs SKY BLUE BUILDERS and another — Respondents

Court: Islamabad