Procurement by public authority
Procurement by public authority legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
In the meanwhile, a dispute arose between the Pakistan Railways and the Forest Department regarding ownership of the trees, but the Divisional Superintendent, Pakistan Railways issued letter to the petitioner directing him to deposit the remaining bid amount within seven days with further warning that otherwise the amount already deposited would be forfeited, which remaining bid money was not deposited and during pendency of present petition, the Pakistan Railways re-auctioned in favour of private respondent, whereupon the petitioner filed second writ petition for protection of his rights
Validity
Pakistan Railways had to first resolve issues of ownership of trees with the Forest Department, then had to remove apprehensions of the petitioner and, thereafter, notice should have been issued to the petitioner requiring him to deposit the bid amount
Conduct of the Pakistan Railways was not sustainable in the eyes of law
Constitutional petition was disposed of and the matter was referred to the Divisional Superintendent, Pakistan Railways with direction to look into it, redress the grievance of the petitioner by resolving the issue regarding ownership of trees with the Forest Department.
Any violation of law and unjust and partial practice of public functionaries which adversely affect the rights of the citizen for lawful participation of obtaining contracts through general tender would be unconstitutional and the jurisdiction under Art. 199 of the Constitution can be invoked in such cases.
Public authority should not be bound to give effect to every term mentioned in the tender document, as it had the power to waive technical irregularity of little or no significance
Public functionaries had the power/ authority to deviate from and not insist upon strict compliance of a condition (in the tender).
Public authority should not be bound to give effect to every term mentioned in the tender document, as it had the power to waive technical irregularity of little or no significance
Public functionaries had the power/ authority to deviate from and not insist upon strict compliance of a condition (in the tender).
"Procurement by public authority", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124952896
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Procurement by public authority"
2023 Y L R 236
GULL AKBAR KHAN — Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN RAILWAYS and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore (Rawalpindi Bench)2015 C L D 130
A.M. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (PVT.) LIMITED through Chief Executive Officer and another — Petitioners Versus The NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY through Chairman and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2017 C L C 178
A.M. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (PVT.) LIMITED through Chief Executive Officer and another — Petitioners Versus NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY through Chairman and 2 others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2024 Balochistan 56
Messrs CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF BALOCHISTAN through Authorized representative and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Chief Secretary, Quetta and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2024 S C M R 947
PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary C&W, Lahore and others — Appellants Versus Messrs HAROON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2024 Islamabad 213
Messrs KAC-RMS (JOINT VENTURE) through authorized representative — Petitioner Versus NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY through Chairman and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2026 C L C 54
University Road, Peshawar — Petitioner Versus KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA PUBLIC PROCUREMENT REGULATORY AUTHORITY, PESHAWAR and others — Respondents
Court: PeshawarP L D 2021 Sindh 515
Syed GHULAM MOHIUDDIN and another — Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary and 2 others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2019 Sindh 467
Mrs. HUMERA IMRAN through Attorney — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE AND PRODUCTION through Secretary and 3 others — Respondents
Court: High Court2021 C L C 472
Messrs TAJ MEDICOS through Proprietor — Plaintiff Versus PUBLIC PROCUREMENT REGULATORY AUTHORITY through Chairman/Managing Director and 5 others — Defendants
Court: Sindh