Home Maxims & Terms Procurement by public authority meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Procurement by public authority

Procurement by public authority legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2023 YLR 236 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Art. 199Constitutional petitionProcurement by public authorityScopeDivisional Superintendent, Pakistan Railways, published an advertisement for auction of dead and wind fallen treesAuction was conducted; the petitioner was declared as highest bidder and he deposited a certain sum

In the meanwhile, a dispute arose between the Pakistan Railways and the Forest Department regarding ownership of the trees, but the Divisional Superintendent, Pakistan Railways issued letter to the petitioner directing him to deposit the remaining bid amount within seven days with further warning that otherwise the amount already deposited would be forfeited, which remaining bid money was not deposited and during pendency of present petition, the Pakistan Railways re-auctioned in favour of private respondent, whereupon the petitioner filed second writ petition for protection of his rights

Validity

Pakistan Railways had to first resolve issues of ownership of trees with the Forest Department, then had to remove apprehensions of the petitioner and, thereafter, notice should have been issued to the petitioner requiring him to deposit the bid amount

Conduct of the Pakistan Railways was not sustainable in the eyes of law

Constitutional petition was disposed of and the matter was referred to the Divisional Superintendent, Pakistan Railways with direction to look into it, redress the grievance of the petitioner by resolving the issue regarding ownership of trees with the Forest Department.

2023 YLR 236 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Art. 199Constitutional petitionMaintainabilityProcurement by public authorityScope

Any violation of law and unjust and partial practice of public functionaries which adversely affect the rights of the citizen for lawful participation of obtaining contracts through general tender would be unconstitutional and the jurisdiction under Art. 199 of the Constitution can be invoked in such cases.

2017 CLC 178 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
R. 4Procurement by public authorityTerms of tenderNon-compliance withTechnical irregularity, waiving ofScope

Public authority should not be bound to give effect to every term mentioned in the tender document, as it had the power to waive technical irregularity of little or no significance

Public functionaries had the power/ authority to deviate from and not insist upon strict compliance of a condition (in the tender).

2015 CLD 130 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
R. 4Procurement by public authorityTerms of tenderNon-compliance withTechnical irregularity, waiving ofScope

Public authority should not be bound to give effect to every term mentioned in the tender document, as it had the power to waive technical irregularity of little or no significance

Public functionaries had the power/ authority to deviate from and not insist upon strict compliance of a condition (in the tender).

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Procurement by public authority", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124952896

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Procurement by public authority"

YLR 2023
N/A

2023 Y L R 236

GULL AKBAR KHAN — Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN RAILWAYS and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Rawalpindi Bench)
CLD 2015
2014-January-24

2015 C L D 130

A.M. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (PVT.) LIMITED through Chief Executive Officer and another — Petitioners Versus The NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY through Chairman and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 2017
2014-January-24

2017 C L C 178

A.M. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (PVT.) LIMITED through Chief Executive Officer and another — Petitioners Versus NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY through Chairman and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2024
2023-May-29

P L D 2024 Balochistan 56

Messrs CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF BALOCHISTAN through Authorized representative and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Chief Secretary, Quetta and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 2024
C.P.L.As. Nos. 2226-L of 2021 to C.P.L.A. No. 2241-L of 2021, C.P.L.As. Nos. 2253-L of 2021 to C.P.L.A. No. 2255-L of 2021, C.P.L.A. No. 2270-L of 2021, C.P.L.A. No. 2277-L of 2021, C.P.L.As. Nos. 371-L of 2022 to C.P.L.A. No. 373-L of 2022 and C.P.L.A. No. 3396-L of 2022, decided on 20th February, 2024.

2024 S C M R 947

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary C&W, Lahore and others — Appellants Versus Messrs HAROON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2024
2022-December-21

P L D 2024 Islamabad 213

Messrs KAC-RMS (JOINT VENTURE) through authorized representative — Petitioner Versus NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY through Chairman and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 2026
2024-November-5

2026 C L C 54

University Road, Peshawar — Petitioner Versus KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA PUBLIC PROCUREMENT REGULATORY AUTHORITY, PESHAWAR and others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
PLD 2021
2021-June-29

P L D 2021 Sindh 515

Syed GHULAM MOHIUDDIN and another — Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary and 2 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2019
2019-February-12

P L D 2019 Sindh 467

Mrs. HUMERA IMRAN through Attorney — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE AND PRODUCTION through Secretary and 3 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 2021
2020-June-4

2021 C L C 472

Messrs TAJ MEDICOS through Proprietor — Plaintiff Versus PUBLIC PROCUREMENT REGULATORY AUTHORITY through Chairman/Managing Director and 5 others — Defendants

Court: Sindh