Maintenance for child
Maintenance for child legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
To maintain his child was obligation of the father and his responsibility could not be absolved merely on the basis that the mother was an earning-hand
Neither the father was stated to be poor nor incapable of earning.
Husband being father of child born to wife was required under law not only to provide food and shelter but also take care of genuine needs of the family.
"Maintenance for child", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124953022
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Maintenance for child"
2010 Y L R 1309
Mst. BISMA SAFDAR — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2015 C L C 1326
RASHID SHAMIM — Petitioner Versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT/CIVIL JUDGE COURT NO.II, MUZAFFAGARH
Court: High Court (AJ&K)1989 C L C 1979
ABDUL REHMAN‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. KHATOON and 2 others‑‑Respondents
Court: Karuchil2015 M L D 11
KHALID BASHIR — Petitioner Versus Mst. SHAMAS-UN-NISA and others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1977 Karachi 469
SALEEM ARMED‑Petitioner Versus Mst. KHADIJA BEGUM AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑ Ss. 5, 7,12(2) & 20 and Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 488‑Maintenance‑Proceedings to enforce a right to mainten ance under Ss. 5 & 7 of Act‑Held, quite distinct and different from these under S. 488, Cr. P. C.‑Pleadings filed before Family Judge invested with powers of Magistrate First Class without specifying whether same was a suit under S. 7 of Act or an application under S. 488, Cr. P. C.‑Cannot be held to be proceedings both under S. 20 of the Act as well as under S. 488, Cr. P. C.‑Family Judge cannot entertain application under S. 488(3) in absence of an order under S. 4880), Cr. P. C.‑Maintenance.P L D 1969 Azad J & K 42
MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN‑Petitioner Versus Mst. ZEENAT BIBI‑Respondent
Court: High Court1987 C L C 247
MUHAMMAD ASLAM‑‑Petitioner Versus FAMILY JUDGE and 2 others‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2024 Supreme Court 581
QUDRAT ULLAH — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, RENALA KHURD DISTRICT OKARA and others — Respondents
Court: High Court1985 C L C 487
PHAKKAR — Petitioner Versus Mst. PATHANI and 2 others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1957 (W
Syed MUSHAF HUSAIN SHAH‑Petitioner Versus Mst. HAMIDA BEGUM‑Respondent
Court: High Court