Home Maxims & Terms Destination meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Destination

Destination legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2015 PTD 63 INLAND REVENUE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL OF PAKISTAN Judicial Precedent
S.13Sales Tax Special Procedures Rules, 2007, R.13(3)"Exemption""Exclusion"Destination

Primary difference between "exclusion" and "exemption" was that exclusion reduces the value of taxable supply, while exemption reduces the amount of tax

Exclusion reduces the value of supply, exemption first reduces the quantum of tax and as a consequence reduces the payability of tax due, both leading to the same result of reducing the tax liability/payability of the Registered Person

Mathematically speaking exclusion of certain items from the value of supply and exemption work on opposite sides of the one and the same equation

At the end of day, both the incentives/ methodologies "reduce" and "exempt" the tax liability of the Registered Person which may be in varying degree, under the provisions of Sales Tax Act, 1990.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Destination", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124953060

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Destination"

MLD 1997
Writ Petition No.D‑738 of 1995, decided on 11th February, 1996.

1997 M L D 1859

its Managing Director‑‑‑Petitioner Versus CHIEF COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, APPRAISEMENT AND PREVENTIVE COLLECTORATE CUSTOMS HOUSE, KARACHI and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
CLC 1992
Constitutional Petition No.D‑719 of 1991, heard on 22nd October, 1991.

1992 C L C 57

M. HAMEEDULLAH KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus DIRECTOR CUSTOMS INTELLIGENCE and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PTD 2003
N/A

2003 P T D 14

Messrs N. B. TRADING COMPANY, SAMBERIAL (SIALKOT) and others Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPRAISEMENT), CUSTOM HOUSE, LAHORE

Court: Karachi High Court
PTD 2015
Customs Appeals Nos.K-146; 148 to 196, K-278 to 288 K-526 to 549, K-457, K-559 of 2012 and K-2199 to 3097 of 2013, decided on 12th August, 2014.

2015 P T D (Trib

Messrs NATIONAL LOGISTIC CELL Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS and others

Court: Customs Appellate Tribunal
PLC(CS) 1984
Appeal No. RI‑702 of 1982, decided on 13th December, 1983.

1984 P L C 1192

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE Versus PUNJAB URBAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab
PLD 1959
Criminal Appeal No. 9 of 1958, decided on 2nd February 1959.

P L D 1959 (W

M. SHARIF ASGHAR‑Convict‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court:
PTD 2007
Special Customs Reference Application No.84 of 2006, decided on 10th October, 2006.

2007 P T D 234

COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS Versus Messrs AYAZ AHMED

Court: Karachi High Court
PTD 2022
Custom Appeal No.56 of 2004, decided on 28th October, 2021.

2022 P T D 626

SANA ULLAH KHAN and another Versus ASSISTANT COLLECTOR ANTI SMUGGLING ORGANIZATION and others

Court: Lahore High Court
PLD 2007
2006-May-31

P L D 2007 Karachi 322

UZAIR ZAKARIA — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: High Court
MLD 2022
2021-October-26

2022 M L D 1973

GILGIT-BALTISTAN POLICY INSTITUTE (GBPI) through Chief Executive Officer and another — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF GILGIT-BALTISTAN through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan, Gilgit and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court