Home Maxims & Terms Contents of petition meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Contents of petition

Contents of petition legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2023 PLD 458 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 139, 142, 143, 144 & 145Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. VII, R. 11Election petitionPresentation of petitionParties to the petitionContents of petitionProcedure before the Election TribunalRejection of petitionScopeChapter IX of the Elections Act, 2017, lays down a procedure for the settlement of election disputes

In terms of S. 139, no election shall be called in question except by an election petition filed by a candidate for that election

For the trial of election petitions under the Elections Act, 2017, the Election Commission of Pakistan appoints as many Election Tribunals as may be necessary for swift disposal of election petitions

Election petition is to be presented in a manner provided under S. 142, and S. 144 lays down necessary pre- conditions for the election petition

Subsection (4) of S. 144 ordains that an election petition and its annexures shall be signed by the petitioner and the petition shall be verified in the manner laid down in the Civil Procedure Code for the verification of pleadings

Section 145 prescribes a procedure before the Election Tribunal

Subsection (1) of S. 145 contemplates if any provision of S. 142, 143 or 144 has not been complied with, the Election Tribunal shall summarily reject the election petition

Once the Election Tribunal reaches the conclusion that petition is not proceedable it cannot wait till the culmination of the proceedings through regular trial

Mandate of law is to nip the evil in the bud

Civil Procedure Code also bestows power upon the Civil Court to reject the plaint summarily in terms of O. VII, R. 11, if it suffers with the flaws mentioned in the said provision

Election Tribunal, thus, can proceed on the same pari materia and reject the election petition at any stage

Tribunal is even vested with the power to adopt any other procedure for the expeditious disposal depending upon the circumstances of the case

Provisions of the Elections Act, 2017, are unequivocal and clear to this extent that a petitioner while presenting the election petition is obliged to adhere the mandate of Ss. 142, 143 & 144 of the Elections Act, 2017

Non- compliance of any of the said provisions renders automatic rejection of the election petition.

2015 PLC(CS) 37 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Arts. 184(3) & 199(1)(b)(ii)Constitutional petition before the Supreme Court/High CourtQuo warranto, writ ofMaintainabilityContents of petitionConduct of petitionerIn writ petitions in the nature of quo warranto, the message was more important than the messenger

Contents of such petitions generally override concerns arising on account of the conduct or antecedents of a petitioner.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Contents of petition", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124953068

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Contents of petition"

CLC 2014
2013-October-3

2014 C L C 276

Mian ZIA-UR-REHMAN — Petitioner Versus Syed AHMED HUSSAIN SHAH — Respondent

Court: Peshawar
CLC 2010
2009-November-16

2010 C L C 912

Sardar MUHAMMAD YAQOOB KHAN NASIR — Petitioner Versus Sardar MUHAMMAD ISRAR TAREEN and others — Respondents

Court: Election Tribunal Quetta
YLR 2016
W.P. 1144 of 2015, decided on 27th February, 2015.

2016 Y L R 2106

Mst. AYESHA MALIK — Petitioner Versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION CITY JAMPUR DISTRICT RAJANPUR and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 2025
2024-March-11

2025 C L C 1990

AYESHA BATOOL — Petitioner Versus JOINT ADMISSION COMMITTEE FOR ADMISSION IN MEDICAL COLLEGES OF AJ&K through Chairman and 4 others — Respondents

Court: High Court AJ&K
MLD 2003
2003-June-6

2003 M L D 1842

Syed MUHAMMAD SHAH — Petitioner Versus MARVI MAZHAR and others — Respondents

Court: Election Tribunal Sindh
PCRLJ 2007
2007-September-4

2007 P Cr

FAIZ AHMED — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE/JUSTICE OF PEACE, SARGODHA and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLR 2017
W.P. No.1633 of 2016, decided on 31st May, 2016.

2017 Y L R 870

MINHAAJ SAQIB and 2 others — Petitioners Versus NAJM-US-SAQIB and another — Respondents

Court: Islamabad
PLD 2009
2008-September-10

P L D 2009 Quetta 16

EHSANULLAH REKI — Petitioner Versus Lt.-Gen. (Retd.) ABDUL QADIR BALOCH and 2 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
YLR 2003
Election Petition No. 182 of 2002, decided on 19th June, 2003.

2003 Y L R 3021

MUHAMMAD ASLAM MUJAHID‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MAHMOOD AHMED QURESHI and 9 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Election Tribunal Sindh
YLR 2003
Election Petition No. 182 of 2002, decided on 19th June, 2003.

2003 Y L R 2878

MUHAMMAD ASLAM MUJAHID — Petitioner Versus MAHMOOD AHMED QURESHI and 9 others — Respondents

Court: Election Tribunal Sindh