Determination of seniority
Determination of seniority legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Appointment of members of District Judiciary and determination of their seniority was a statutory responsibility, which was to be exercised by the Administration Committee of the High Court
Chief Justice of the High Court in such context could not do anything on his own
Any decision taken by the Administration Committee of the High Court (in the matter of appointment of members of District Judiciary and determination of their seniority) shall be binding on the Chief Justice of the High Court.
Petitioner was appointed as Prosecuting Sub-Inspector and subsequently his cadre was changed from prosecution side to executive side along with other colleagues
Grievance of the petitioner was that after absorption of the Prosecuting Sub-Inspectors, seniority to others was allowed from the date of their initial appointment but the petitioner had been discriminated by awarding him seniority from the date of his absorption
Validity
Under Arts.25 & 4 of the Constitution, equal protection of law to all the citizens and equal treatment to the citizens similarly placed had been guaranteed
All the statutory functionaries in a democratic set-up were bound to act in public matters justly, fairly and in accordance with rules and instructions on the subject and individual distinction for extraneous reasons was not permissible
`Equality before law' meant that like should be treated alike and it forbade discrimination between person, who were substantially in similar circumstances or conditions, however, it did not forbid different treatment of unequals and classification could be made between two groups which were substantially not placed in similar circumstances or conditions
Petitioner was subjected to hostile discrimination forbidden by Art.25 of the Constitution
High Court directed the respondents to treat the petitioner equally and on the same line as other officers had been treated and assigned seniority to the petitioner from the date of his substantive appointment in the rank of Prosecuting Sub-Inspector with all service benefits
Constitutional petition was allowed in circumstances.
"Determination of seniority", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124953070
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Determination of seniority"
1985 S C M R 174
Ch. UMAR DIN — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: ---Art.212--Determination of seniority of civil servant--Leave to appeal--Appeal of petitioner before Service Tribunal dismissed as time- barred as same had not been filed within period of limitation from making representation--Contention that period of limitation be counted from letter of the Department which was neither a final order nor appeal able --Tribunal, held, justified in dismissing appeal as time-barred in circumstances and no case of interference by Supreme Court was made out--Since a final determination of seniority of petitioner was yet to be made by department, petitioner would, therefore, be entitled to press for such determination notwithstanding view taken by Tribunal- Petition for leave to appeal dismissed.--Civil service.1993 P L C 928
MUHAMMAD ASHRAF and 5 others Versus CHAIRMAN, MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, JHANG
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab1996 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD ZAFAR KHAN Versus SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD and 155 others
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1993 P L C (C
M. TAHIR RASHID and 2 others Versus SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD and 82 others
Court: Federal Service Tribunal1995 S C M R 1840
MUHAMMAD ZAFAR KHAN‑‑‑Appellant Versus SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2018 P L C (C
SHOUKAT ALI MUGHAL, Versus SECRETARY SERVICES AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT MUZAFFARABAD and 14 others
Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)1993 P L C (C
M. TAHIR RASHEED and 2 others Versus SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD and others
Court: Federal Service Tribunal1995 P L C (C
Raja MUHAMMAD ASHRAF KAYANI Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Muzaffarabad and 4 others
Court: Service Tribunal AJ&K1991 P L C (C
Dr. ATTA MUHAMMAD MANGI Versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH,
Court: Federal Service Tribunal1990 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD RAFIQ ASGHAR Versus PRIME MINISTER OF PAKISTAN and 12 others
Court: Federal Service Tribunal