Remedy against violation

Enough time was given to petitioner to deposit VR amount but he failed to do so, thereafter, notice was given to him and finally a reference was filed

After VR agreement was signed voluntarily and without any duress, petitioner had no right or justification to question validity of reference or investigation conducted by National Accountability Bureau

Option to avail VR was valid till such time the reference was not filed and when the matter had become sub judice in Accountability Court, petitioner could not take the plea that recovery should have been made under West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, instead of filing reference against petitioner

Petitioner concealed factum of existence of his VR agreement with National Accountability Bureau

Earlier also petitioner was dismissed from service on account of misappropriation of wheat amounting to Rs.23,95,575, then he was reinstated in service subject to payment of misappropriated amount in instalments

Petitioner was again suspended on account of shortage of 4661 wheat bags and he was issued show cause notice

Petitioner submitted his undertaking that he would credit Rs.30,00,000 and also signed VR with National Accountability Bureau for payment of missing wheat bags

Track record of petitioner was self-explanatory, therefore, High Court declined to grant bail to petitioner

Petition was dismissed in circumstances.