Mentally disabled person

Whenever fraud was unfolded to the Revenue Officer or brought to his notice at any time, he should rectify the revenue record

Question of limitation would be irrelevant in such like matters

Medical Superintendent had declared the respondent to be mentally retarted person

Revenue Officer was justified in recalling the impugned mutations

Mentally disabled person was deprived of his valuable property and revenue hierarchy was perfect in exercise of its jurisdiction

Revenue Officer was appointed as 'Receiver' of said land who would take charge/possession of the same and invest the income of the property upon the treatment and upbringing of respondent until and unless his manager was appointed by the Protection Court

Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances.

Mother of mentally disabled girl was appointed as her guardian and manager of property subject to furnishing of surety bond

Guardian/mother submitted surety bond before the Court of Protection, but the same was declined on the basis that the person who intended to stand surety for the guardian/mother had all his properties located in a city which was different from the city wherein almost all the properties of mentally disabled girl were located, thus it was not safe and proper to allow the surety, and guardian/mother should submit fresh local surety

Validity

Guardian/mother was bound to furnish surety bond to the satisfaction of the Court of Protection

Expression "satisfaction of the Court' clearly manifested that the surety should be adequate and acceptable to the Court

Court of Protection being conscious of its duty to safeguard the rights of the mentally disabled girl and exercising its discretion in appropriate and judicious manner had clearly expressed its reservation with regard to propriety and suitability of the surety and thus declined to accept the same

No exception could be taken to the findings of the Court of Protection

Appeal was dismissed accordingly.