Defamation proceedings
Defamation proceedings legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Appellants initiated their remedy under S.9 of Defamation Ordinance, 2002, and therein also claimed relief of special damages
Trial Court directed appellants to pay ad valorem court fee for the claim of (special) damages propounded in their petition
Legality
Section 9 of Defamation Ordinance, 2002, which dealt with remedies, could be split and segregated into two parts: the first was relatable to tendering of apology and statutory damages which the court could allow, for which no court fee was payable; second part of the section however starting with the expression "and in addition thereto, any special damage incurred that is proved by the plaintiff to the satisfaction of the court", was an added right of the party, giving him a choice and option to claim special damages from the special forum or to resort to civil suit
Said remedy (of special damages) available to the person approaching the "Court" was in the nature of a civil suit and the claim shall attract the payment of ad valorem court fee under S.7(1) of the Court Fees Act, 1870
Appeal was dismissed accordingly.
"Defamation proceedings", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124953503
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Defamation proceedings"
2010 Y L R 2595
ANSAR ABBASI — Appellant Versus Mst. FOUZIA WAHAB — Respondent
Court: Karachi2016 M L D 1654
NAUMAN SHEHZAD — Applicant Versus ABDUL HANAN and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh (Sukkur Bench)P L D 2015 Supreme Court 134
Ch. ZULFIQAR ALI CHEEMA and 3 others — Appellants Versus FARHAN ARSHAD MIR and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2010 C L D 1175
Rao DIL JAN KHAN — Appellant Versus DR. MUHAMMAD YOUNIS and another — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2010 Lahore 413
Rao DIL JAN KHAN — Appellant Versus Dr. MUHAMMAD YOUNIS and another — Respondents
Court: High Court2014 M L D 1199
SAID RASOOL — Appellant Versus Dr. HAMAYUN KHAN and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Peshawar2014 C L D 284
SAID RASOOL — Appellant Versus Dr. HAMAYUN KHAN and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Peshawar2025 M L D 1668
Asim Iqbal — Appellant Versus Mateen Sadiq and another — Respondents
Court: Sindh2023 M L D 525
CHIEF EDITOR MUHAMMAD RIAZ ANJUM and others — Appellants Versus Dr. MOHAMMAD SHAHBAZ — Respondent
Court: Lahore (Rawalpindi Bench)2020 C L C 618
ZAFAR HIJJAZI, CHIEF EDITOR, DAILY MUHASIB ABBOTTABAD and 4 others — Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD AYAZ MUSHWANI — Respondent
Court: Peshawar (Abbottabad Bench)