Revision jurisdiction of the court
Revision jurisdiction of the court legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Revisional jurisdiction was a supervisory jurisdiction, which was vested in a higher forum (subject to the pecuniary jurisdiction of the case either the District Court or the High Court) and was exercised and/or was invoked for scrutiny if a 'case decided' by the court subordinate to the higher court's jurisdiction, suffered from any defect in terms of exercise of its jurisdiction and/or on the grounds(s) that the court subordinate had acted in exercise of such jurisdiction illegally and/or with material irregularity
Being a supervisory jurisdiction, the higher forum which was approached (i.e. the revisional court) was conferred with the power to ensure that the court subordinate thereto conformed to the parameters of its jurisdiction
Revisional jurisdiction was meant to rectify, to obviate, forefend and stage off the exercise of jurisdictional errors/defects and the illegalities and/or material irregularity committed by the subordinate court in such regard.
"Revision jurisdiction of the court", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124953504
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Revision jurisdiction of the court"
1996 S C M R 437
and 5 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Mst. FAZLAN BIBI and 4 other‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2015 Supreme Court 137
MANDI HASSAN alias MEHDI HUSSAIN and another — Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD ARIF — Respondent
Court: High Court1994 M L D 1513
Mst. ROSHAN BIBI — Petitioner Versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE (CONSOLIDATION), LAHORE and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2016 Y L R Note 1
SAJJAN through L. Hrs. and others — Applicants Versus SHER MUHAMMAD PHULPOTO through Attorney — Respondent
Court: Sindh (Sukkur Bench)1977 S C M R 306
SAEEDUDDIN AHMAD NAQVI AND OTHERS‑Appellants Versus ABDUL GHAFOOR AND OTHERS — Respondents
Court: Art. 98‑Displaced Persons (Laud Settlement) Act (XLVII of 1958), S. 19(2)‑‑‑Pakistan Rehabilitation Act (XLII of 1956), S. 11(4) Writ Jurisdiction Revision- Jurisdiction-- Rehabilitation Commissioner having had Jurisdiction to entertain revision petition necessarily empowered to decide whether or not to condone delay in its presentation High Court, held, in circumstances ought not interfere with Rehabilitation Commissioners orders in its writ jurisdiction. Jurisdiction‑Revision (civil).1989 M L D 4950
ZAKAR NAZAR HUSSAIN‑‑Petitioner Versus KHAN MUHAMMAD and others‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2008S81
SARTAJ KHAN and others — Appellants Versus ARSHAD ALI and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1985 Lah
MESSRs MIAN BROTHERS AND 3 OTHERS-Petitioners Versus THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, . MULTAN
Court: -- Art. 9-Constitutional petition - Delay in filing - Relevant order impugned in constitutional petition, having been challenged earlier through revision petition which was still pending -Delay in filing constitutional petition, per se, held, would not be fatal.Delay.P L D 1991 Lahore 256
MUHAMMAD YAR — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF and another — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2021 Peshawar 166
TEHSILDAR, MARDAN and 5 others — Petitioners Versus ASIF BACHA — Respondent
Court: High Court