Decision on each issue

If a judgment discusses all points raised it fulfills the requirement of law even though it may not have discussed each issue separately.

Trial Court was bound to decide each and every issue separately unless finding upon any one or more of the issues was sufficient for the decision of suit

Fraud had been alleged for preparation of power of attorney

Present suit called for full-dressed trial so that valuable rights of the parties be determined after recording evidence from both the sides

Appellate Court rightly considered the nature of dispute and remanded the case for decision on all issues in accordance with law

Revision was dismissed in circumstances.

Appeal was allowed in circumstances.

Trial Court was bound to give findings on each issue separately unless findings upon any one or more issues was sufficient for the decision of the suit

Impugned judgment and decrees passed by the Trial Court were not sustainable which were set aside

Case was remanded to the Trial Court for decision afresh

Appeal was allowed in circumstances.

Court was required to discuss the relevant evidence having direct nexus with the specific point and record reasons to justify the findings

Matters which were irrelevant or extraneous and unnecessary should neither be introduced nor could be construed while replying a specific issue

Rights of parties with regard to controversy in the suit should be conclusively determined in the judgment

Court was bound to specify findings with reasons on each issue

In the present case, findings on each issue had not been given by the court below

Said judgments were against the mandate of law which could not be declared a legal and valid "judgments"

Judgments and decrees in question were set aside and cases were remanded to the Trial Court for decision afresh in accordance with law within a specified period

Appeal was disposed of, in circumstances.

Trial Court passed decree for possession but same was set aside by the Appellate Court and decree for possession was passed in favour of defendants

Validity

Conclusion made by the Appellate Court was based on surmises and conjectures

Impugned order passed by the Appellate Court was set aside and case was remanded to the said court for decision afresh after appreciating the evidence of the parties issuewise

Appeal was accepted in circumstances.

Suit could be finally determined if sufficient evidence was available on record.