Home Maxims & Terms Diligence and efficiency meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Diligence and efficiency

Diligence and efficiency legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2009 PLC(CS) 568 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 8Promotion, out of turnDiligence and efficiencyAppreciationPrinciple

In appreciation of his excellent and extraordinary performance, civil servant was awarded out of turn promotion under the instruction of Inspector General of Police

Subsequently the civil servant was reverted to his earlier rank on the ground that promotion could only be granted on the basis of seniority cum fitness and such promotion resulted in injustice to his seniors and had become cause of frustration and heart burning to those who were superseded

Validity

Performance of duty with due diligence and efficiently deserved due appreciation but it could not be over appreciated out of proportion so as to make out a case of grievance to other employees in service of department

If a case of glaring favouritism was made out resulting in mala fide action, the same had to be rectified in accordance with law to avoid injustice

Supreme Court declined to set aside valid order passed by authorities merely on conjectures or surmises

Practice of such out of turn promotion would encourage a person to obtain any order using underhand means or otherwise and then to claim immunity for such acts which would, therefore, result in rewarding the person using such means by allowing him to continue to enjoy fruits of such ill-gotten gains and thus could perpetuate injustice

Supreme Court declined to interfere with order of reversion passed by authorities and maintained by Service Tribunal

Appeal was dismissed.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Diligence and efficiency", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124953648

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Diligence and efficiency"

PLC(CS) 2009
Civil Appeal No.116 of 2006, decided on 8th September, 2008.

2009 P L C (C

FARHAT ABBAS Versus I.-G. and others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2009
Civil Appeal No.116 of 2006, decided on 8th September, 2008.

2009 S C M R 245

FARHAT ABBAS — Appellant Versus I.-G. and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 2010
2010-July-26

2010 C L C 1685

Dr. HAMID NAWAZ KHOKHAR — Petitioner Versus MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS HOSPITAL, HAFIZABAD and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLC(CS) 2023
N/A

2023 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD KAMRAN KHAN Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary Special Education and others

Court: Lahore High Court
PLD 2009
2008-September-11

P L D 2009 Lahore 14

IMTIAZ AHMED — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: High Court
PLC(CS) 1988
Appeal No. 966 of 1986, decided on 10th November, 1987.

1988 P L C (C

MUNIR AHMAD Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB

Court: Service Tribunal Punjab
PLC(CS) 2005
Appeal No.247(K)(CS) of 2002, decided on 16th June, 2004.

2005 P L C (C

SOHAIL AHMED SIDDIQUI Versus DIRECTOR NICH, KARACHI and another

Court: Federal Service Tribunal
PLC(CS) 2010
Constitutional Petition No.D-1849 of 2008, decided on 11th March, 2009.

2010 P L C (C

Mrs. RUBINA FAIZ Versus UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI through Vice-Chancellor and 5 others

Court: Karachi High Court
PLC 2012
Appeal No.Guj-1024 of 2009, decided on 11th August, 2010.

2012 P L C 207

ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN LIMITED through Attorneys Versus KARAMAT HUSSAIN CHEEMA

Court: Punjab Labour Appellate Tribunal
PLC(CS) 1984
Case No. 530/1315 of 1981, decided on 16th February, 1983.

1984 P L C (C

AKHTAR MAHMOOD QURESHI Versus DEPUTY INSPECTOR‑GENERAL OF POLICE, TELE‑COMMUNICATION & TRANSPORT, LAHORE AND ANOTHER

Court: Service Tribunal Punjab