Home Maxims & Terms Appreciation meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Appreciation

Appreciation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2009 PLC(CS) 568 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 8Promotion, out of turnDiligence and efficiencyAppreciationPrinciple

In appreciation of his excellent and extraordinary performance, civil servant was awarded out of turn promotion under the instruction of Inspector General of Police

Subsequently the civil servant was reverted to his earlier rank on the ground that promotion could only be granted on the basis of seniority cum fitness and such promotion resulted in injustice to his seniors and had become cause of frustration and heart burning to those who were superseded

Validity

Performance of duty with due diligence and efficiently deserved due appreciation but it could not be over appreciated out of proportion so as to make out a case of grievance to other employees in service of department

If a case of glaring favouritism was made out resulting in mala fide action, the same had to be rectified in accordance with law to avoid injustice

Supreme Court declined to set aside valid order passed by authorities merely on conjectures or surmises

Practice of such out of turn promotion would encourage a person to obtain any order using underhand means or otherwise and then to claim immunity for such acts which would, therefore, result in rewarding the person using such means by allowing him to continue to enjoy fruits of such ill-gotten gains and thus could perpetuate injustice

Supreme Court declined to interfere with order of reversion passed by authorities and maintained by Service Tribunal

Appeal was dismissed.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Appreciation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124953649

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Appreciation"

PLC 1987
Constitutional Petition No.S‑52 of 1986, decided on 20th May, 1986.

1987 P L C 460(1)

SUBHAN KHAN Versus LABOUR COURT NO. I and others

Court: Karachi High Court
CLD 2019
2018-April-26

2019 C L D 113

HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED through Branch Manager — Appellant Versus Ms. RUKHSANA MUMTAZ — Respondent

Court: Lahore
MLD 2003
Constitutional Petition No.S.192 of 2002, decided on 16th December, 2002.

2003 M L D 480

SAIFULLAH‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD BUX and 2 others‑‑‑ Respondents

Court: Karachi
CLC 1991
Writ Petition No.2908 of 1990, decided on 24th February, 1991.

1991 C L C 1702

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ SHAH‑‑‑Petitioner Versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1981
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. K-81 of 1981. decided on 23rd August 1981.

1981 S C M R 1233

HAFIZ MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus ABBAS KHAN AND ANOTHER-Respondents

Court: S. 100-Second appeal-Appreciation of evidence-Findings of fact recorded by first appellate Court-Final and binding and cannot be interfered with merely on basis of same being based on an incorrect appreciation of evidence.-Findings of fact-Evidence.
PLC 2001
Constitutional Petition No. S‑467 and Civil Miscellaneous Application No.751 of 2000. decided on 23rd October, 2000.

2001 P L C 325

Mst. HUMA and another Versus MUHAMMAD ASHFAQUE and others

Court: Karachi High Court
PLD 1988
Civil Appeal No.9 of 1984, decided on 11th May, 1988.

P L D 1988 Supreme Court (AJ&K) 203

Mst. NISHADAH BEGUM and 3 others‑‑Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD AYUB KHAN‑‑Respondent

Court: ‑‑‑S.100‑‑Second appeal‑‑Appreciation of evidence‑‑ Failure of Court to appreciate the evidence while curing error in the decision of subordinate Court in violation of S.100, C.P.C.‑‑Omission to appreciate oral testimony of parties where no reason was assigned in the order to overlook and ignore such evidence, being a serious breach of law, cannot be lightly ignored, ‑‑Evidence.
SCMR 1987
Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 325 of 1985, decided on 12th January, 1987.

1987 S C M R 540

GHULAM MURTAZA‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: ‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S. 10‑‑Appreciation of evidence‑‑Conviction and sentence of death based on evidence that deceased was last seen alive in company of petitioner‑‑Leave to appeal granted to consider whether well‑established principles of appreciation of evidence in criminal cases had been followed.‑‑Evidence
SCMR 1968
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 21 of 1968, decided on 22nd May 1968.

1968 S C M R 1335 (1)

CHAHAT KHAN AND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: High Court
CLC 2007
2007-February-13

2007 C L C 972

Mst. YASMIN AKHTAR — Appellant Versus ABDUL MATEEN ZAHID — Respondent

Court: Shariat Court (AJ&K)